ArticleHeliyon2024
Methodology exploration and reproducibility evaluation of TAI and TSI for quantitative ultrasound assessment of hepatic steatosis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in quantitative ultrasound for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Association of one-hour postload plasma glucose combined with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and FIB-4 screening positivity with elevated LDL cholesterol and cerebrovascular stenosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: New quantitative ultrasound techniques can be used to quantify hepatic steatosis, including tissue attenuation imaging (TAI), tissue scatter -distribution imaging (TSI), and the hepatorenal index (HRI). However, the measurement norms and the effects of fasting on these measurements remain unclear. The present study performed a methodological exploration and investigated the reliability of these measurements. Methods: In total, 103 participants were prospectively recruited for ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. For the TAI and TSI data, the upper (2 cm), middle (4 cm) and lower (6 cm) areas determined according to the depth of the region of interest from the liver capsule, were sampled three times. Correlation analyses were performed to compare the measurements of TAI, TSI, and HRI with the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) or MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Intra- and inter-operator repeatability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. The effects of fasting on these measurements were then compared. Results: The TAI and TSI measurements obtained from the upper and middle depths exhibited stronger correlations with the CAP measurements than those obtained from the lower depth. Specifically, the mean TAI had a significant positive correlation with MRI-PDFF (r = 0.753, P < 0.0001). TAI and TSI measurements exhibited excellent intra- (0.933 and 0.925, respectively) and inter- (0.896 and 0.766, respectively) examiner reliability. However, the correlation between HRI and CAP measurements was only 0.281, with no significant correlation with MRI-PDFF, and intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of 0.458 and 0.343, respectively. Fasting did not affect these measurements. Conclusions: TAI and TSI measurements demonstrated good intra- and interobserver reliability and correlated well with CAP and MRI-PDFF measurements. However, in practice-based clinical applications, the sampling depth should be controlled within 2-4 cm of the hepatic capsule; no fasting is required before the examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.