Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845959›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

An analysis of customer perception using lexicon-based sentiment analysis of Arabic Texts framework.

Ohud Alsemaree, Atm S Alam, Sukhpal Singh Gill, Steve Uhlig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ohud AlsemareeSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Atm S AlamSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Sukhpal Singh GillSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Steve UhligSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentiment Analysis (SA) employing Natural Language Processing (NLP) is pivotal in determining the positivity and negativity of customer feedback. Although significant research in SA is focused on English texts, there is a growing demand for SA in other widely spoken languages, such as Arabic. This is predominantly due to the global reach of social media which enables users to express opinions on products in any language and, in turn, necessitates a thorough understanding of customers' perceptions of new products based on social media conversations. However, the current research studies demonstrate inadequacies in furnishing text analysis for comprehending the perceptions of Arabic customers towards coffee and coffee products. Therefore, this study proposes a comprehensive Lexicon-based Sentiment Analysis on Arabic Texts (LSAnArTe) framework applied to social media data, to understand customer perceptions of coffee, a widely consumed product in the Arabic-speaking world. The LSAnArTe Framework incorporates the existing AraSenTi dictionary, an Arabic database of sentiment scores for Arabic words, and lemmatizes unknown words using the Qalasadi open platform. It classifies each word as positive, negative or neutral before conducting sentence-level sentiment classification. Data collected from X (formerly known as Twitter, resulted in a cleaned dataset of 10,769 tweets, is used to validate the proposed framework, which is then compared with Amazon Comprehend. The dataset was annotated manually to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability in validating the proposed LSAnArTe Framework. The results revealed that the proposed LSAnArTe Framework, with an accuracy score of 93.79 %, outperformed the Amazon Comprehend tool, which had an accuracy of 51.90 %.

Identifiers

PMID38845959
PMCPMC11154218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.