ArticleHeliyon2024
A decentralized federated learning-based cancer survival prediction method with privacy protection.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bilayer Feature Fusion Framework for Pan-Cancer Survival Prediction Based on Multihead Attention and Adaptive Differential Privacy: Model Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multivariate integration for pulmonary arterial pressure prediction in pulmonary hypertension.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Linear Federated Learning for Outcome Prediction With Application to Hepatocellular Carcinoma Radiotherapy.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2025Article
- Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology.MedComm · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Survival prediction is one of the crucial goals in precision medicine, as accurate survival assessment can aid physicians in selecting appropriate treatment for individual patients. To achieve this aim, extensive data must be utilized to train the prediction model and prevent overfitting. However, the collection of patient data for disease prediction is challenging due to potential variations in data sources across institutions and concerns regarding privacy and ownership issues in data sharing. To facilitate the integration of cancer data from different institutions without violating privacy laws, we developed a federated learning-based data integration framework called AdFed, which can be used to evaluate patients' survival while considering the privacy protection problem by utilizing the decentralized federated learning technology and regularization method. Results: AdFed was tested on different cancer datasets that contain the patients' information from different institutions. The experimental results show that AdFed using distributed data can achieve better performance in cancer survival prediction (AUC = 0.605) than the compared federated-learning-based methods (average AUC = 0.554). Additionally, to assess the biological interpretability of our method, in the case study we list 10 identified genes related to liver cancer selected by AdFed, among which 5 genes have been proved by literature review. Conclusions: The results indicate that AdFed outperforms better than other federated-learning-based methods, and the interpretable algorithm can select biologically significant genes and pathways while ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.