Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845923›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Determining the rate and reasons for specimen rejection among specimens referred for HIV viral load determination through referral linkage to Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, north-central, Ethiopia,2023: Retrospective study.

Ayenew Berhan, Andargachew Almaw, Shewaneh Damtie, Yenealem Solomon, Biruk Legese, Birhanu Getie, Mulat Erkihun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ayenew BerhanDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Andargachew AlmawDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Shewaneh DamtieDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Yenealem SolomonDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Biruk LegeseDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Birhanu GetieDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Mulat ErkihunDepartment of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The preanalytical phase encompasses the time between the clinician's test order to the sample being ready for analysis. Of all errors during the laboratory diagnostic process,70 % appeared in the pre-analytical phase. In clinical laboratories, it is crucial to ensure proper specimen collection and handling, which is essential to guarantee quality assessment, monitoring process standardization, improving performance, and ensuring patient safety. Despite this importance, no study has been conducted in the study area to investigate the rate and reasons for human immunodeficiency virus viral load sample rejection. Objective: To determine the rate of human immunodeficiency virus viral load sample rejection (number of preanalytical errors) documented during the preanalytical phase and articulate possible causes for specimen rejection. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from January 1st to January 31, 2023. During the study period, 5950 samples were extracted from the human immunodeficiency virus viral load laboratory sample tracking log books, which were sent to the hospital for viral load testing between August 2021 to November 2022. The collected data were cleaned and entered into EPI data version 4.6 before transferred it to STATA version 14.0 for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, and cross-tabulations were used to summarize the findings. Results: The study found that improper sample handling was common during the preanalytical phase. According to the current study, 3.6 % of the sample was rejected at pre analytical stage. The most common reasons for specimen rejection were using inappropriate containers (64.0 %) uncentrifuged specimens (20.4 %); hemolyzed specimens (7.0 %); insufficient specimen volume (6.2 %); clotted specimens (1.9 %); and specimen labeling problems (0.5 %). Conclusion: This study found that the most common preanalytical error was using an inappropriate sample collection container, followed by uncentrifuged samples, Therefore, it is recommended that mentorship programs be developed to educate staff on the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing, specifically on sample collection, storage, and transportation for HIV viral load testing. Additionally, the quality management system of laboratory processes should be strengthened to ensure accuracy and minimize errors.

Indexed as

EthiopiaHuman immunodeficiency virusRejectionSpecimenViral load

Identifiers

PMID38845923
PMCPMC11153166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.