Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845835›Full record

ReviewGland surgery2024

Surgical treatment algorithm for breast cancer lymphedema-a systematic review.

Caroline Lilja, Christoffer Bing Madsen, Tine Engberg Damsgaard, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Jørn Bo Thomsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline LiljaResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3933-5580
Christoffer Bing MadsenResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1088-9512
Tine Engberg DamsgaardResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1627-9566
Jens Ahm SørensenResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-0094
Jørn Bo ThomsenResearch Unit of Plastic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7368-6133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various surgical treatments are increasingly adopted and gaining popularity for lymphedema treatment. However, challenges persist in selecting appropriate treatment modalities targeted for individual patients and achieving consensus on choice of treatment as well as outcomes. The systematic review aimed to create a treatment algorithm incorporating the latest scientific knowledge, to provide healthcare professionals and patients with a tool for informed decision-making, when selecting between treatments or combining them in a relevant manner. This systematic review evaluated and synthesized the evidence on the effectiveness of three surgical treatments for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL): lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and liposuction. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases on 18 June 2023, including Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.org. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparative studies, and observational studies that assessed the outcomes of LVA, VLNT, or liposuction in managing BCRL. The primary results of interest were changes in arm volume, lymphatic flow, and quality of life. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection and data extraction. Following this, we systematically reviewed and conducted a risk of bias assessment. Results were qualitatively presented, and a treatment algorithm was developed based on the available data. Results: We identified 16,593 papers, after removal of duplicates. Following assessment of studies, 73 articles met the inclusion criteria, including 2,373 patients. We were not able to conduct a meta-analysis due to considerable heterogeneity in the methodologies and outcome measures across the studies. Liposuction appears effective for patients presenting with non-pitting lymphedema. LVA indicates variable success rate, with some evidence indicating a reduction in limb volume and symptomatic relief amongst early stages of lymphedema. VLNT showed promising results for limb volume reduction and symptom improvement in patients presenting with mild and moderate lymphedema. Conclusions: Liposuction, LVA, and VLNT seem to be effective treatments for BCRL, when targeted for the appropriate patient. Well-conducted high evidence clinical studies in the field are still lacking to uncover the efficacy of surgical treatment for BCRL.

Indexed as

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL)liposuctionlymphovenous anastomosis (LVA)secondary lymphedemavascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT)

Identifiers

PMID38845835
PMCPMC11150198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.