ArticleGland surgery2024
Baseline circulating tumor DNA predicts long-term survival outcomes for patients with early breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical Validity of FoundationOne Liquid CDx for Detection of BRAFV600E in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer research communications · 2025Trial
- Prognostic and monitoring value of circulating tumor DNA at multiple clinical time points in breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential biomarker not only capable of monitoring the treatment response during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) or rescue therapy, but also identifying minimal residual disease (MRD) and detecting early relapses after primary treatment. However, it remains uncertain whether the detection of ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, can predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate the predictive value of baseline ctDNA for prognosis in patients with early breast cancer. Methods: A total of 90 patients with early breast cancer and 24 healthy women were recruited between August 2016 and October 2016. Peripheral blood samples were collected from patients at diagnosis, before any treatment. Blood samples were processed and subjected to targeted deep sequencing with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel of 1,021 cancer-related genes. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) were reported. Results: The 90 patients with breast cancer included 6 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 84 patients with invasive breast cancer. Within the cohort of patients with invasive breast cancer, ctDNA were detected in 57 patients, with a ctDNA detection rate of 67.9%. Meanwhile, no ctDNA was detected in DCIS patients. Among 84 patients with invasive breast cancer, patients with high-level ctDNA had a significantly lower RFS compared to patients with low-level ctDNA (log-rank P=0.0036). Conclusions: Our study suggested that ctDNA at diagnosis, before any treatment, could potentially serve as a biomarker to predict the prognosis for patients with early breast cancer. However, further follow-up and more studies with large sample sizes are required to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.