ArticleGland surgery2024
Deep convolutional neural network model ResNeSt for discrimination of papillary thyroid carcinomas and benign nodules in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application progress of artificial intelligence in managing thyroid disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- AI in Cytopathology: A Narrative Umbrella Review on Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model was employed for the differentiation of thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) according to the 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). The aim of this study was to investigate the efficiency of ResNeSt in improving the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy. Methods: Fragmented images were used to train and test DCNN models. A training dataset was built from 1,330 samples diagnosed as papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) or benign nodules, and a test dataset was built from 173 samples diagnosed as AUS. ResNeSt was trained and tested to provide a differentiation. With regard to AUS samples, the characteristics of the cell nuclei were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The ResNeSt model achieved an accuracy of 92.49% (160/173) on fragmented images and 84.78% (39/46) from a patient wise viewpoint in discrimination of PTC and benign nodules in AUS nodules. The sensitivity and specificity of ResNeSt model were 95.79% and 88.46%. The κ value between ResNeSt and the pathological results was 0.847 (P<0.001). With regard to the cell nuclei of AUS nodules, both area and perimeter of malignant nodules were larger than those of benign ones, which were 2,340.00 (1,769.00, 2,807.00) Conclusions: In summary, the DCNN model ResNeSt showed great potential in discriminating thyroid nodules diagnosed as AUS. Among those nodules, malignant nodules showed larger and more deeply stained nuclei than benign nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.