Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845619›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2023

Monkeypox and oral lesions associated with its occurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hiroj Bagde, Ashwini Dhopte, Ferdous Bukhary, Naif Momenah, Fatema Akhter, Okba Mahmoud, Krishna Prasad Shetty, Maher Al Shayeb, Huda Abutayyem, Mohammad Khursheed Alam

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hiroj BagdePeriodontology, Rama University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-6800
Ashwini DhopteOral Medicine and Radiology, Rama University, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208024, India.
Ferdous BukharyPreventive Dental Sciences, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, 13314, Saudi Arabia.
Naif MomenahRiyadh Second Health Cluster, Saudi Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, 13314, Saudi Arabia.
Fatema AkhterSurgical and Diagnostic Sciences, Dar Al Uloom University, Riyadh, Riyadh Province, 13314, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4756-3815
Okba MahmoudClinical Science Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3355-1429
Krishna Prasad ShettyClinical Science Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Maher Al ShayebClinical Science Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3296-5945
Huda AbutayyemClinical Science Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Mohammad Khursheed AlamOrthodontic Division, Preventive Dentistry Department, Jouf University, Sakaka, Al Jowf, 72345, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A zoonotic, double-stranded DNA virus belonging to the genus Orthopoxvirus, the mpox virus (MPXV) is most common in tropical regions of Central and West Africa. The frequency of monkeypox (mpox) cases, however, has sharply climbed globally since May 2022. Objectives: To establish the threat of mpox in terms of the oral lesions caused in sufferers. Materials and methods: After a thorough study of the literature identified in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases using the PRISMA framework, 103 papers were found. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria, we chose research that was relevant for our review before shortlisting 14 papers that conformed to the review's guidelines. Results: In the 14 selected studies, it was found that oral lesions were among the first clinical signs of a mpox affliction, with ulcers on the dorsal surface of tongue lips being the most common areas affected. Conclusion: The rarely observed oral lesions of mpox infection may help in the diagnosis and management of this condition. It is critical to keep in mind that recognising and detecting oral lesions in mpox patients opens the door to more research and efficient patient management.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxAnimalsHumansMonkeypox virusMouth DiseasesMonkeypox; Oral lesions; Outbreak; Systematic review; Zoonotic virus

Identifiers

PMID38845619
PMCPMC11153993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.