ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Highly sensitive detection of fluorescent whitening agents in flour using sheathless capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) are dyes that emit visible blue or blue-purple fluorescence upon ultraviolet-light absorption. Taking advantage of light complementarity, FWAs can compensate for the yellow color of many substances to achieve a whitening effect; thus, they are used extensively in various applications. FWAs are generally stable, but their presence in the environment can lead to pollution and accumulation in the body through the food chain. Recent studies have revealed that some types of FWAs, such as coumarin-based FWAs, may exhibit photo-induced mutagenic effects that can trigger allergic reactions in humans and even pose carcinogenic risks. Hence, the development of an accurate and highly sensitive method for detecting FWAs in food-related samples is a crucial endeavor. Owing to the high polarity and structural similarity of FWAs, the accurate determination of these substances in complex food samples requires an analytical method that offers both efficient separation and sensitive detection. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) exhibits essential features such as high separation efficiency, short analysis times, very small sample injection requirements, minimal use of organic solvents, and simple operation. Thus, it is often used as an effective alternative to liquid chromatographic techniques. Over the past few decades, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) has been utilized as a highly sensitive and accurate detection method in numerous chemical analytical fields because it enables the analysis of molecular structures. By combining the high separation efficiency of CE with the high sensitivity of ESI-MS, a powerful tool for identifying and quantifying trace amounts of FWAs in food samples may be obtained. In this study, we present a method based on sheathless CE coupled with electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) for the simultaneous detection of six trace FWAs in flour. In the proposed method, the CE separation device is directly coupled to the mass spectrometer through a sheathless interface without the need for a sheath liquid for electric contact, thereby avoiding the dilution of the analytes and improving detection sensitivity. Various conditions that could affect extraction recovery, separation efficiency, and detection sensitivity were evaluated and optimized. The FWAs were effectively extracted from the sample matrix with reduced matrix effects by ultrasonic-assisted extraction at a temperature of 30 ℃ for 20 min using CHCl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.