ReviewSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Recent advances of molecular imprinting technology for the separation and recognition of complex biological sample systems].
Review in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual-Template Magnetic Molecularly Imprinted Polymers of Hydrocortisone and Prednisolone: Preparation, Characterization and Application.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- [Progress in electric field assisted molecular imprinting technology].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Review
- [Molecular imprinting strategies and advances targeting biomembranes].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Review
- [Efficient separation of gossypol from cotton kernels with copper mediated magnetic molecularly imprinted polymer].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2026Article
- Smart Nucleic Acid Hydrogel-Based Biosensors: From Molecular Recognition and Responsive Mechanisms to Applications.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Salivary α-Amylase as a Metabolic Biomarker: Analytical Tools, Challenges, and Clinical Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given continuous improvements in industrial production and living standards, the analysis and detection of complex biological sample systems has become increasingly important. Common complex biological samples include blood, serum, saliva, and urine. At present, the main methods used to separate and recognize target analytes in complex biological systems are electrophoresis, spectroscopy, and chromatography. However, because biological samples consist of complex components, they suffer from the matrix effect, which seriously affects the accuracy, sensitivity, and reliability of the selected separation analysis technique. In addition to the matrix effect, the detection of trace components is challenging because the content of the analyte in the sample is usually very low. Moreover, reasonable strategies for sample enrichment and signal amplification for easy analysis are lacking. In response to the various issues described above, researchers have focused their attention on immuno-affinity technology with the aim of achieving efficient sample separation based on the specific recognition effect between antigens and antibodies. Following a long period of development, this technology is now widely used in fields such as disease diagnosis, bioimaging, food testing, and recombinant protein purification. Common immuno-affinity technologies include solid-phase extraction (SPE) magnetic beads, affinity chromatography columns, and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Immuno-affinity techniques can successfully reduce or eliminate the matrix effect; however, their applications are limited by a number of disadvantages, such as high costs, tedious fabrication procedures, harsh operating conditions, and ligand leakage. Thus, developing an effective and reliable method that can address the matrix effect remains a challenging endeavor. Similar to the interactions between antigens and antibodies as well as enzymes and substrates, biomimetic molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) exhibit high specificity and affinity. Furthermore, compared with many other biomacromolecules such as antigens and aptamers, MIPs demonstrate higher stability, lower cost, and easier fabrication strategies, all of which are advantageous to their application. Therefore, molecular imprinting technology (MIT) is frequently used in SPE, chromatographic separation, and many other fields. With the development of MIT, researchers have engineered different types of imprinting strategies that can specifically extract the target analyte in complex biological samples while simultaneously avoiding the matrix effect. Some traditional separation technologies based on MIP technology have also been studied in depth; the most common of these technologies include stationary phases used for chromatography and adsorbents for SPE. Analytical methods that combine MIT with highly sensitive detection technologies have received wide interest in fields such as disease diagnosis and bioimaging. In this review, we highlight the new MIP strategies developed in recent years, and describe the applications of MIT-based separation analysis methods in fields including chromatographic separation, SPE, diagnosis, bioimaging, and proteomics. The drawbacks of these techniques as well as their future development prospects are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.