Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845472›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2024

Determinants of successful ictal SPECT injection in phase 1 epilepsy presurgical evaluation: Findings from the pediatric epilepsy research consortium surgery database project.

Charuta Joshi, Rani Singh, Gang Liu, Cemal Karakas, Michael Ciliberto, Krista Eschbach, M Scott Perry, Daniel Shrey, Tricia Morphew, Adam P Ostendorf and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Charuta JoshiUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Children's Health, Dallas, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4502-7242
Rani SinghDivision of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Atrium Health/Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
Gang LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Atrium Health/Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, NC, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Cemal KarakasDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-2285
Michael CilibertoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Krista EschbachDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neurology, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4249-338X
M Scott PerryJane and John Justin Institute for Mind Health, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1825-846X
Daniel ShreyDivision of Neurology, Children's Hospital Orange County, Orange, California, USA.
Tricia MorphewChildren's Hospital Orange County Research Institute, Orange, California, USA.
Adam P OstendorfDepartment of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-6650
Shilpa B ReddyDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Michael J McCormackDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Samir KariaDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Neurology, University of Louisville, Norton Children's Hospital, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-2458
Shrishti NangiaDivision of Pediatric Neurology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, New York City, New York, USA.
Lily Wong-KisielDepartment of Neurology, Divisions of Child Neurology and Epilepsy, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
PERC Surgery Workgroup

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe main goal of presurgical evaluation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy is to identify a seizure onset zone (SOZ). Of the noninvasive, yet resource-intensive tests available, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) aids SOZ localization by measuring focal increases in blood flow within the SOZ via intravenous peri-ictal radionuclide administration. Recent studies indicate that geographic and center-specific factors impact utilization of these diagnostic procedures. Our study analyzed successful ictal SPECT acquisition (defined as peri-ictal injection during inpatient admission) using surgery-related data from the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) surgery database. We hypothesized that a high seizure burden, longer duration of video EEG monitoring (VEEG), and more center-specific hours of SPECT availability would increase the likelihood of successful ictal SPECT.

methodsWe identified study participants (≤18 years of age) who underwent SPECT as part of their phase 1 VEEG from January 2018 to June 2022. We assessed association between ictal SPECT outcomes (success vs. failure) and variables including patient demographics, epilepsy history, and center-specific SPECT practices.

resultsPhase 1 VEEG monitoring with ictal SPECT injection was planned in 297 participants and successful in 255 participants (85.86%). On multivariable analysis, the likelihood of a successful SPECT injection was higher in patients of non-Hispanic ethnicity (p = 0.040), shorter duration VEEG (p = 0.004), and higher hours of available SPECT services (p < 0.001). Higher seizure frequency (p = 0.033) was significant only in bivariate analysis. Patients treated at centers with more operational hours were more likely to experience pre-admission protocols prior to VEEG (p = 0.002). SIGNIFICANCE: There is inter-center variability in protocols and SPECT acquisition capabilities. Shorter duration of EEG monitoring, non-Hispanic ethnicity (when on private insurance), extended operational hours of nuclear medicine as noted on multivariate analysis and higher seizure frequency in bivariate analysis are strongly associated with successful ictal SPECT injection. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans can be helpful in localizing seizure onset zone. However, due to many logistical challenges described below, which include not only the half-life of the technetium isotope used to inject intravenously during a seizure (called the ictal SPECT scan) but also available nuclear scanner time in addition to the unpredictability of seizures, obtaining an ictal SPECT during a planned elective inpatient hospital stay is not guaranteed. Thus, as healthcare costs increase, planning a prolonged hospital stay during which an ictal SPECT scan is not feasible is not optimal. We leveraged our prospective surgery database to look at center-specific factors and patient-specific factors associated with an ictal SPECT injection in the first, pediatric-focussed, large-scale, multicenter, prospective, SPECT feasibility study. We found that longer availability of the scanner is the most important center-specific factor in assuring ictal SPECT injection. Although seizure frequency is an important patient-specific factor on bivariate analysis, this factor lost statistical significance when other factors like patient insurance status and video EEG duration were also considered in our multivariable logistical model.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyElectroencephalographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansInfantMalePreoperative CareVideo Recordingepilepsy surgeryinstitutional factorsnuclear medicineoperational hoursvideo EEG duration

Identifiers

PMID38845472
PMCPMC11296100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.