Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845343›Full record

ArticleMedical education online2024

The 2024 French guidelines for scenario design in simulation-based education: manikin-based immersive simulation, simulated participant-based immersive simulation and procedural simulation.

Guillaume Der Sahakian, Maxime de Varenne, Clément Buléon, Guillaume Alinier, Christian Balmer, Antonia Blanié, Bertrand Bech, Anne Bellot, Hamdi Boubaker, Nadège Dubois and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education online, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Guillaume Der SahakianDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Centre Hospitalier d'Orange, Orange, France.
Maxime de VarenneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Clément BuléonCenter for Medical Simulation, Liège University Hospital, Liège Belgium.
Guillaume AlinierSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Christian BalmerPaediatric Cardiology, Paediatric Heart Center, Department of Surgery, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Antonia BlaniéDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Kremlin Bicêtre University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Bertrand BechDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Kremlin Bicêtre University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Anne BellotCentre de simulation NorSimS & Service de néonatalogie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie & Université de Caen-Normandie, Caen, France.
Hamdi BoubakerEmergency Department, Fattouma Bourguiba University Hospital & Research Laboratory, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.
Nadège DuboisDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege & Center for Medical Simulation, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Francisco GuevaraChargé de projets en simulation continue et initiale, Cadre de santé formateur en simulation en santé, IFSI Croix Saint Simon, Montreuil, France.
Erwan GuillouetCenter for Medical Simulation, Liège University Hospital, Liège Belgium.
Jean-Claude GranryAllSims Center for Simulation in Healthcare, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France.
Morgan JaffrelotDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
François LecomteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cochin University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Fernande LoisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Mohammed MouhaouiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Ollivier OrtoléDepartment of Emergency Medicine & CESU Martinique, University Hospital Center of Martinique, Fort-de-France, France.
Méryl PaquayDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege & Center for Medical Simulation, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Justine PiazzaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Quartier Hôpital, University Hospital of Liege & Center for Medical Simulation, Liège University Hospital, Liège, Belgium.
Marie PittacoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Centre Hospitalier d'Orange, Orange, France.
Patrick PlaisanceDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lariboisière University Hospital, APHP, Université de Paris & ILumens Platform of Medical Simulation Paris University, Paris, France.
Dan BenhamouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Kremlin Bicêtre University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.
Gilles ChiniaraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Etienne RivièreDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cochin University Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0254-3394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation-based education in healthcare encompasses a wide array of modalities aimed at providing realistic clinical experiences supported by meticulously designed scenarios. The French-speaking Society for Simulation in Healthcare (SoFraSimS) has developed guidelines to assist educators in the design of scenarios for manikin- or simulated participant- based immersive simulation and procedural simulation, the three mainly used modalities.

methodsAfter establishing a French-speaking group of experts within the SoFraSimS network, we performed an extensive literature review with theory-informed practices and personal experiences. We used this approach identify the essential criteria for practice-based scenario design within the three simulation modalities.

resultsWe present three comprehensive templates for creating innovative scenarios and simulation sessions, each tailored to the specific characteristics of a simulation modality. The SoFraSimS templates include five sections distributed between the three modalities. The first section contextualizes the scenario by describing the practicalities of the setting, the instructors and learners, and its connection to the educational program. The second section outlines the learning objectives. The third lists all the elements necessary during the preparation phase, describing the educational method used for procedural simulation (such as demonstration, discovery, mastery learning, and deliberate practice). The fourth section addresses the simulation phase, detailing the behaviors the instructor aims to analyze, the embedded triggers, and the anticipated impact on simulation proceedings (natural feedback). This ensures maximum control over the learning experience. Finally, the fifth section compiles elements for post-simulation modifications to enhance future iterations.

conclusionWe trust that these guidelines will prove valuable to educators seeking to implement simulation-based education and contribute to the standardization of scenarios for healthcare students and professionals. This standardization aims to facilitate communication, comparison of practices and collaboration across different learning and healthcare institutions.

Indexed as

ManikinsSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceEducation, MedicalFranceGuidelines as TopicHumanscrisis resource managementimmersive simulationprocedural simulationscenario designsimulated patientSimulation-based education

Identifiers

PMID38845343
PMCPMC11164058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.