ArticleBiophysical journal2024
On the response of elongating ribosomes to forces opposing translocation.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ribosome derives the energy to translocate and unwind mRNA from EF-G binding.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Near-cognate tRNAs dominate codon decoding times in simulated ribosomes.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Taming the ribosome.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The elongation phase of protein synthesis is a cyclic, steady-state process. It follows that its directionality is determined by the thermodynamics of the accompanying chemical reactions, which strongly favor elongation. Its irreversibility is guaranteed by its coupling to those reactions, rather being a consequence of any of the conformational changes that occur as it unfolds. It also follows that, in general, the rate of elongation is not proportional to the forward rate constants of any of its steps, including its final, mechano-chemical step, translocation. Instead, the reciprocal of the rate of elongation should be linearly related to the reciprocal of those rate constants. When the results of experiments done a decade ago to measure the effect that forces opposing translocation have on the rate of elongation are reinterpreted in light of these findings, it becomes clear that translocation was rate limiting under conditions in which those experiments were done, and that it is likely to be a Brownian ratchet process, as was concluded earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.