Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38845199›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2024

On the response of elongating ribosomes to forces opposing translocation.

Peter B Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Taming the ribosome.Biophysical journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter B MooreDepartment of Chemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: peter.moore@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elongation phase of protein synthesis is a cyclic, steady-state process. It follows that its directionality is determined by the thermodynamics of the accompanying chemical reactions, which strongly favor elongation. Its irreversibility is guaranteed by its coupling to those reactions, rather being a consequence of any of the conformational changes that occur as it unfolds. It also follows that, in general, the rate of elongation is not proportional to the forward rate constants of any of its steps, including its final, mechano-chemical step, translocation. Instead, the reciprocal of the rate of elongation should be linearly related to the reciprocal of those rate constants. When the results of experiments done a decade ago to measure the effect that forces opposing translocation have on the rate of elongation are reinterpreted in light of these findings, it becomes clear that translocation was rate limiting under conditions in which those experiments were done, and that it is likely to be a Brownian ratchet process, as was concluded earlier.

Indexed as

Peptide Chain Elongation, TranslationalRibosomesBiomechanical PhenomenaKineticsModels, BiologicalProtein BiosynthesisThermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID38845199
PMCPMC11427781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.