Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844940›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

Revisiting superiority and stability metrics of cultivar performances using genomic data: derivations of new estimators.

Humberto Fanelli Carvalho, Simon Rio, Julian García-Abadillo, Julio Isidro Y Sánchez

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Humberto Fanelli Carvalho *Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP, UPM-INIA)-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo-UPM, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Simon Rio *CIRAD, UMR AGAP Institut, 34398, Montpellier, France.
Julian García-AbadilloCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP, UPM-INIA)-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo-UPM, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Julio Isidro Y Sánchez *Centro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas (CBGP, UPM-INIA)-Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Campus de Montegancedo-UPM, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain. j.isidro@upm.es.

Funding

Beatriz Galindo BEAGAL18/00115Horizon 2020 818144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selection of highly productive genotypes with stable performance across environments is a major challenge of plant breeding programs due to genotype-by-environment (GE) interactions. Over the years, different metrics have been proposed that aim at characterizing the superiority and/or stability of genotype performance across environments. However, these metrics are traditionally estimated using phenotypic values only and are not well suited to an unbalanced design in which genotypes are not observed in all environments. The objective of this research was to propose and evaluate new estimators of the following GE metrics: Ecovalence, Environmental Variance, Finlay-Wilkinson regression coefficient, and Lin-Binns superiority measure. Drawing from a multi-environment genomic prediction model, we derived the best linear unbiased prediction for each GE metric. These derivations included both a squared expectation and a variance term. To assess the effectiveness of our new estimators, we conducted simulations that varied in traits and environment parameters. In our results, new estimators consistently outperformed traditional phenotype-based estimators in terms of accuracy. By incorporating a variance term into our new estimators, in addition to the squared expectation term, we were able to improve the precision of our estimates, particularly for Ecovalence in situations where heritability was low and/or sparseness was high. All methods are implemented in a new R-package: GEmetrics. These genomic-based estimators enable estimating GE metrics in unbalanced designs and predicting GE metrics for new genotypes, which should help improve the selection efficiency of high-performance and stable genotypes across environments.

Indexed as

EcovalenceEnvironmental varianceFinlay–Wilkinson regression coefficientGenomic predictionGenotype-by-environmentLin–Binns superiority measure

Identifiers

PMID38844940
PMCPMC11155189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.