ArticleBMC public health2024
HIV-related public stigma in the era of "Undetectable = Untransmittable": a population-based study in Hong Kong.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Undetectable = Untransmittable (U = U) Awareness and HIV Treatment Optimism Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Mumbai, India.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Joint Associations of Undetectable=Untransmittable Awareness and Social Proximity with Sexual Decision-Making With People Living With HIV: A Cross-Sectional Study in Japan.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in HIV/AIDS Prevention: Focusing on Antiretroviral Therapy.Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2025Review
- A call to action to advance global research priorities related to Undetectable = Untransmittable.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025Article
- Assessment of U = U knowledge and influencing factors among the population in Henan Province China based on an internet-based survey.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- HIV/AIDS knowledge and stigma attitudes among older men in Sichuan Province, Southwest China: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- The relationship between cognitive characteristics of irrational parenthood and stigma in female patients with infertility: a potential profile analysis.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2025Article
- Experiences, Challenges, and Needs of People Living with HIV in Hunan Province, China: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Undetectable=Untransmittable Perception and Its Association with Sexual Risk Behaviors and Potential Physical and Psychological Benefits Among People Living with HIV/AIDS in Hunan, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- The knowledge paradox: an inverted U-shaped association between HIV knowledge and stigma among older men in Sichuan Province, Southwest China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile global efforts are increasingly relying upon biomedical advancements such as antiretroviral therapy and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to end the HIV epidemic, HIV-related stigma remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the general public's awareness and perception of "Undetectable = Untransmittable" (U = U) and PrEP, and the patterns of public stigma towards people living with HIV (PLWH) and their determinants in an Asian Pacific city.
methodsA population-based, self-administrated online survey was conducted between 10-20 March 2023. All adults aged ≥ 18 years and currently living in Hong Kong were eligible. Participants' socio-demographic characteristics, awareness and perception of U = U and PrEP, as well as HIV-related stigma drivers, experience and practices were collected. Latent class analysis was used to delineate population subgroups based on their stigma profiles as reflected by 1.) fear of infection, 2.) concern about socioeconomic ramification of the disease, 3.) social norm enforcement, 4.) perceived stigma in the community, and 5.) stigmatising behaviours and discriminatory attitudes. Memberships of identified subgroups were then correlated with sociodemographic factors, awareness and perception of U = U and PrEP, using multinominal logistic regression.
resultsResponses from a total of 3070 participants (55% male; 79% aged 18-54) were analysed. A majority, 69% and 81%, indicated that they had never heard of U = U and PrEP respectively, and only 39-40% of participants perceived these to be effective in protection from HIV. Four distinct subgroups were identified, namely "Low stigma" (37%), "Modest stigma" (24%), "Moderate stigma" (24%), and "High stigma" (15%). Compared with "Low stigma", lack of awareness of and/or negative perceptions towards U = U and/or PrEP, not knowing any PLWH were associated with increased odds of higher stigma group membership. Lower educational level and not in employment were associated with increased odds of membership in "Moderate stigma" and "High stigma". While older people were more likely to belong to "High stigma", female were more likely to belong to "Moderate stigma". "Modest stigma" included more younger people who were economically active.
conclusionTwo-thirds of participants endorsed modest-to-high HIV-related stigma, suggesting the prevalence of HIV-related stigma was high among the general population in Hong Kong. Tailored interventions targeting specific stigma drivers and manifestations of individuals as reflected from the stigma profiles of distinct subgroups could form an important strategy for stigma reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.