ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
The impact of the combat method on radiomics feature compensation and analysis of scanners from different manufacturers.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CT-based radiomics signature for optimizing adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in stage II colorectal cancer with proficient mismatch repair.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Externally validated yet undertrained: sample size deficits in machine learning-based radiomics.European radiology · 2026Article
- Category-ComBat with distribution coefficient: a scale-adaptive harmonization algorithm for multicenter radiomic feature standardization.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integration of MRI radiomics with immune profiling to predict response to CDK6 inhibitors in high-grade glioma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Observational
- Integrative multi-region MRI radiomics and clinical nomogram for preoperative lymphovascular invasion prediction in rectal cancer: a multicenter validation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- A Priori Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Using Deep Features from Pre-Treatment MRI and CT.Cancers · 2025Article
- Application of prediction model based on CT radiomics in prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A CT-based interpretable deep learning signature for predicting PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer: a two-center study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- MRI-based radiomics for noninvasive prediction of T790M resistance mutation in lung cancer spinal metastases: an exploratory study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated whether the Combat compensation method can remove the variability of radiomic features extracted from different scanners, while also examining its impact on the subsequent predictive performance of machine learning models. MATERIALS AND
methods135 CT images of Credence Cartridge Radiomic phantoms were collected and screened from three scanners manufactured by Siemens, Philips, and GE. 100 radiomic features were extracted and 20 radiomic features were screened according to the Lasso regression method. The radiomic features extracted from the rubber and resin-filled regions in the cartridges were labeled into different categories for evaluating the performance of the machine learning model. Radiomics features were divided into three groups based on the different scanner manufacturers. The radiomic features were randomly divided into training and test sets with a ratio of 8:2. Five machine learning models (lasso, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, neural network) were employed to evaluate the impact of Combat on radiomic features. The variability among radiomic features were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the receiver curve (AUC) were used as evaluation metrics for model classification.
resultsThe principal component and ANOVA analysis results show that the variability of different scanner manufacturers in radiomic features was removed (P˃0.05). After harmonization with the Combat algorithm, the distributions of radiomic features were aligned in terms of location and scale. The performance of machine learning models for classification improved, with the Random Forest model showing the most significant enhancement. The AUC value increased from 0.88 to 0.92.
conclusionsThe Combat algorithm has reduced variability in radiomic features from different scanners. In the phantom CT dataset, it appears that the machine learning model's classification performance may have improved after Combat harmonization. However, further investigation and validation are required to fully comprehend Combat's impact on radiomic features in medical imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.