Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844854›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

The impact of the combat method on radiomics feature compensation and analysis of scanners from different manufacturers.

Xiaolei Zhang, M Iqbal Bin Saripan, Yanjun Wu, Zhongxiao Wang, Dong Wen, Zhendong Cao, Bingzhen Wang, Shiqi Xu, Yanli Liu, Mohammad Hamiruce Marhaban and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A CT-based interpretable deep learning signature for predicting PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer: a two-center study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaolei ZhangFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. zhangxiaolei_yx@163.com.
M Iqbal Bin SaripanFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Yanjun WuHebei International Research Center of Medical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China.
Zhongxiao WangHebei International Research Center of Medical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China.
Dong WenInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Zhendong CaoDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical University, Chengde, Hebei, China.
Bingzhen WangFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Shiqi XuHebei International Research Center of Medical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China.
Yanli LiuHebei International Research Center of Medical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China.
Mohammad Hamiruce MarhabanFaculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
Xianling DongHebei International Research Center of Medical Engineering, Chengde Medical University, Chengde City, Hebei Province, China. dongxl@cdmc.edu.cn.

Funding

Chengde Biomedicine Industry Research Institute Funding project 202205B086Hebei Province Introduced Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars Funding Project C20220107Wellcome Trust 202423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated whether the Combat compensation method can remove the variability of radiomic features extracted from different scanners, while also examining its impact on the subsequent predictive performance of machine learning models. MATERIALS AND

methods135 CT images of Credence Cartridge Radiomic phantoms were collected and screened from three scanners manufactured by Siemens, Philips, and GE. 100 radiomic features were extracted and 20 radiomic features were screened according to the Lasso regression method. The radiomic features extracted from the rubber and resin-filled regions in the cartridges were labeled into different categories for evaluating the performance of the machine learning model. Radiomics features were divided into three groups based on the different scanner manufacturers. The radiomic features were randomly divided into training and test sets with a ratio of 8:2. Five machine learning models (lasso, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, neural network) were employed to evaluate the impact of Combat on radiomic features. The variability among radiomic features were assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Accuracy, precision, recall, and area under the receiver curve (AUC) were used as evaluation metrics for model classification.

resultsThe principal component and ANOVA analysis results show that the variability of different scanner manufacturers in radiomic features was removed (P˃0.05). After harmonization with the Combat algorithm, the distributions of radiomic features were aligned in terms of location and scale. The performance of machine learning models for classification improved, with the Random Forest model showing the most significant enhancement. The AUC value increased from 0.88 to 0.92.

conclusionsThe Combat algorithm has reduced variability in radiomic features from different scanners. In the phantom CT dataset, it appears that the machine learning model's classification performance may have improved after Combat harmonization. However, further investigation and validation are required to fully comprehend Combat's impact on radiomic features in medical imaging.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPhantoms, ImagingAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPrincipal Component AnalysisRadiomicsTomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedTomography, X-Ray ComputedCombatCT imagesMachine learningPhantomRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID38844854
PMCPMC11157873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.