Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844842›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Development and validation of peritumoral vascular and intratumoral radiomics to predict pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Tianwen Xie, Jing Gong, Qiufeng Zhao, Chengyue Wu, Siyu Wu, Weijun Peng, Yajia Gu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tianwen Xie *Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Jing Gong *Department of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiufeng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chengyue WuOden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Siyu WuDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weijun PengDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. pengweijun2017@163.com.
Yajia GuDepartment of Radiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. guyajia@126.com.

Funding

Budgeted Program of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2021LK043National Natural Science Foundation of China 82071878Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Medical Innovation Research Project 21Y11910200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate a peritumoral vascular and intratumoral radiomics model to improve pretreatment predictions for pathologic complete responses (pCRs) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NAC) in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

methodsA total of 282 TNBC patients (93 in the primary cohort, 113 in the validation cohort, and 76 in The Cancer Imaging Archive [TCIA] cohort) were retrospectively included. The peritumoral vasculature on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) from pretreatment DCE-MRI was segmented by a Hessian matrix-based filter and then edited by a radiologist. Radiomics features were extracted from the tumor and peritumoral vasculature of the MIP images. The LASSO method was used for feature selection, and the k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) classifier was trained and validated to build a predictive model. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the ROC analysis.

resultsOne hundred of the 282 patient (35.5%) with TNBC achieved pCRs after NAC. In predicting pCRs, the combined peritumoral vascular and intratumoral model (fusion model) yields a maximum AUC of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.88) in the primary cohort, a maximum AUC of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.76) in the internal validation cohort, and a maximum AUC of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.78) in TCIA cohort. The fusion model showed improved performance over the intratumoral model and the peritumoral vascular model, but not significantly (p > 0.05).

conclusionThis study suggested that combined peritumoral vascular and intratumoral radiomics model could provide a non-invasive tool to enable prediction of pCR in TNBC patients treated with NAC.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponseRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeMagnetic resonance angiographyMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyPeritumoral vesselsTriple negative breast neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38844842
PMCPMC11155097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.