ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Ultrasound contrast-enhanced radiomics model for preoperative prediction of the tumor grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: an exploratory study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the radiologic diagnosis of major urological cancers: a meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- A contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based nomogram for preoperative prediction of pseudocapsule status in localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- DASNet: A Convolutional Neural Network with SE Attention Mechanism for ccRCC Tumor Grading.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in urological malignancy diagnosis and prognosis: current status and future prospects.The Canadian journal of urology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-based multimodal prediction for nuclear grading status and prognosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Advancements in the Diagnostic Challenges Within Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multimodal deep learning with MUF-net for noninvasive WHO/ISUP grading of renal cell carcinoma using CEUS and B-mode ultrasound.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to explore machine learning(ML) methods for non-invasive assessment of WHO/ISUP nuclear grading in clear cell renal cell carcinoma(ccRCC) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) radiomics.
methodsThis retrospective study included 122 patients diagnosed as ccRCC after surgical resection. They were divided into a training set (n = 86) and a testing set(n = 36). CEUS radiographic features were extracted from CEUS images, and XGBoost ML models (US, CP, and MP model) with independent features at different phases were established. Multivariate regression analysis was performed on the characteristics of different radiomics phases to determine the indicators used for developing the prediction model of the combined CEUS model and establishing the XGBoost model. The training set was used to train the above four kinds of radiomics models, which were then tested in the testing set. Radiologists evaluated tumor characteristics, established a CEUS reading model, and compared the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS reading model with independent characteristics and combined CEUS model prediction models.
resultsThe combined CEUS radiomics model demonstrated the best performance in the training set, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84, accuracy of 0.779, sensitivity of 0.717, specificity of 0.879, positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.905, and negative predictive value (NPV) of0.659. In the testing set, the AUC was 0.811, with an accuracy of 0.784, sensitivity of 0.783, specificity of 0.786, PPV of 0.857, and NPV of 0.688.
conclusionsThe radiomics model based on CEUS exhibits high accuracy in non-invasive prediction of ccRCC. This model can be utilized for non-invasive detection of WHO/ISUP nuclear grading of ccRCC and can serve as an effective tool to assist clinical decision-making processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.