Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844827›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Implications of human-wildlife conflict on the diet of an endangered avian top predator in the northern Andes.

Juan Sebastián Restrepo-Cardona, Sebastián Kohn, Luis Miguel Renjifo, Juan D Vásquez-Restrepo, Santiago Zuluaga, Félix Hernán Vargas, Fabricio Narváez, Luis A Salagaje, Abel Recalde, Erik Camilo Gaitán-López and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Juan Sebastián Restrepo-CardonaDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA. jsrestrepoc@gmail.com.
Sebastián KohnFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Luis Miguel RenjifoDepartamento de Ecología y Territorio, Facultad de Estudios Ambientales y Rurales, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan D Vásquez-RestrepoLaboratorio de Herpetología, Museo de Zoología "Alfonso L. Herrera", Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Santiago ZuluagaFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Félix Hernán VargasFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Fabricio NarváezFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Luis A SalagajeFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Abel RecaldeFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Erik Camilo Gaitán-LópezUniversidad Surcolombiana, Neiva, Colombia.
Andy SalazarFundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador.
Vanessa HullDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts between rural people and the Endangered Black-and-chestnut Eagle (Spizaetus isidori) are a prominent conservation concern in the northern Andes, as at least 60 eagles were poached between 2000 and 2022 in response to poultry predation. Here, we conducted direct observations to analyze the Black-and-chestnut Eagle diet and evaluated how forest cover affects the feeding habits of the species during nestling-rearing periods in 16 nests located in different human-transformed Andean landscapes of Ecuador and Colombia. We analyzed 853 prey items (46 species) delivered to nestlings. We used Generalized Linear Models to test whether the percent forest cover calculated within varying buffer distances around each nest and linear distances from the nest to the nearest settlement and pasture areas were predictors of diet diversity and biomass contribution of prey. Forest cover was not a factor that affected the consumption of poultry; however, the eagle regularly preyed on chickens (Gallus gallus) (i.e., domestic Galliformes) which were consumed by 15 of the 16 eagle pairs, with biomass contributions (14.57% ± 10.55) representing 0.6-37% of the total prey consumed. The Black-and-chestnut Eagle is an adaptable generalist able to switch from mammalian carnivores to guans (i.e., wild Galliformes) in human-dominated landscapes, and eagles nesting in sites with low forest cover had a less diverse diet than those in areas with more intact forests. Management actions for the conservation of this avian top predator require studies on the eagle's diet in areas where human persecution is suspected or documented, but also maintaining forest cover for the wild prey of the species, development of socio-economic and psychological assessments on the drivers behind human-eagle conflicts, and the strengthening of technical capacities of rural communities, such as appropriate poultry management.

Indexed as

DietEaglesEndangered SpeciesPredatory BehaviorAnimalsAnimals, WildChickensColombiaConservation of Natural ResourcesEcuadorFeeding BehaviorForestsHumans

Identifiers

PMID38844827
PMCPMC11156653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.