Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844822›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2024

Microbes as marine habitat formers and ecosystem engineers.

Roberto Danovaro, Lisa A Levin, Ginevra Fanelli, Lorenzo Scenna, Cinzia Corinaldesi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Roberto DanovaroDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. r.danovaro@univpm.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9025-9395
Lisa A LevinIntegrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-8622
Ginevra FanelliDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8437-2605
Lorenzo ScennaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6957-0843
Cinzia CorinaldesiNational Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy. c.corinaldesi@univpm.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2981-541X

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) OCE-2048720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their small individual size, marine prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes can form large 3D structures and complex habitats. These habitats contribute to seafloor heterogeneity, facilitating colonization by animals and protists. They also provide food and refuge for a variety of species and promote novel ecological interactions. Here we illustrate the role of microbes as ecosystem engineers and propose a classification based on five types of habitat: microbial mats, microbial forests, microbial-mineralized habitats, microbial outcrops and microbial nodules. We also describe the metabolic processes of microbial habitat formers and their ecological roles, highlighting current gaps in knowledge. Their biogeography indicates that these habitats are widespread in all oceans and are continuously being discovered across latitudes and depths. These habitats are also expected to expand under future global change owing to their ability to exploit extreme environmental conditions. Given their high ecological relevance and their role in supporting endemic species and high biodiversity levels, microbial habitats should be included in future spatial planning, conservation and management measures.

Indexed as

EcosystemAquatic OrganismsBacteriaOceans and Seas

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.