Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multinational proficiency tests for EGFR exon 20 insertions reveal that the assay design matters.

Michaela A Ihle, Carina Heydt, Anne Maria Schultheis, Robert Stöhr, Florian Haller, Sylvia Herold, Daniela Aust, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Matthias Evert, Markus Eszlinger and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Current paradigm of EGFRMed (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Michaela A IhleInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany. michaela.ihle@uk-koeln.de.
Carina HeydtInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Anne Maria SchultheisInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Robert StöhrInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian HallerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 8-10, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sylvia HeroldInstitute of Pathology, Hospital of the Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Daniela AustInstitute of Pathology, Hospital of the Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Matthias EvertInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Markus EszlingerInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle, Magdeburger Str. 14, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Anja HaakInstitute of Pathology, University Hospital Halle, Magdeburger Str. 14, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Silke LaßmannInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacherstr. 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Daniela VorholtJanssen-Cilag GmbH, Johnson&Johnson Platz 1, 41470, Neuss, Germany.
Frank BreitenbücherJanssen-Cilag GmbH, Johnson&Johnson Platz 1, 41470, Neuss, Germany.
Martin WernerInstitute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center Freiburg, Breisacherstr. 115a, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Anna StreubelInstitute of Tissue Diagnostics, MVZ at Helios Klinikum Emil Von Behring, Walterhöferstr. 11, 14165, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas MairingerInstitute of Tissue Diagnostics, MVZ at Helios Klinikum Emil Von Behring, Walterhöferstr. 11, 14165, Berlin, Germany.
Maja Grassow-NarlikQuality Assurance Initiative Pathology (Qualitätssicherungs-Initiative Pathologie [QuIP®]), Reinhardtstr. 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine Merkelbach-BruseInstitute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insertion mutations in exon 20 of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR exon20ins) are rare, heterogeneous alterations observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a few exceptions, they are associated with primary resistance to established EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As patients carrying EGFR exon20ins may be eligible for treatment with novel therapeutics-the bispecific antibody amivantamab, the TKI mobocertinib, or potential future innovations-they need to be identified reliably in clinical practice for which quality-based routine genetic testing is crucial. Spearheaded by the German Quality Assurance Initiative Pathology two international proficiency tests were run, assessing the performance of 104 participating institutes detecting EGFR exon20ins in tissue and/or plasma samples. EGFR exon20ins were most reliably identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Interestingly, success rates of institutes using commercially available mutation-/allele-specific quantitative (q)PCR were below 30% for tissue samples and 0% for plasma samples. Most of these mutation-/allele-specific (q)PCR assays are not designed to detect the whole spectrum of EGFR exon20ins mutations leading to false negative results. These data suggest that NGS is a suitable method to detect EGFR exon20ins in various types of patient samples and is superior to the detection spectrum of commercially available assays.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsExonsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingLung NeoplasmsAntibodies, BispecificHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingMutagenesis, InsertionalProtein Kinase InhibitorsamivantamabAntibodies, BispecificEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38844820
PMCPMC11156884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.