ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2024
Computer-aided design and fabrication of nasal prostheses: a semi-automated algorithm using statistical shape modeling.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis research aimed to develop an innovative method for designing and fabricating nasal prostheses that reduces anaplastologist expertise dependency while maintaining quality and appearance, allowing patients to regain their normal facial appearance.
methodsThe method involved statistical shape modeling using a morphable face model and 3D data acquired through optical scanning or CT. An automated design process generated patient-specific fits and appearances using regular prosthesis materials and 3D printing of molds. Manual input was required for specific case-related details.
resultsThe developed method met all predefined requirements, replacing analog impression-making and offering compatibility with various data acquisition methods. Prostheses created through this method exhibited equivalent aesthetics to conventionally fabricated ones while reducing the skill dependency typically associated with prosthetic design and fabrication.
conclusionsThis method provides a promising approach for both temporary and definitive nasal prostheses, with the potential for remote prosthesis fabrication in areas lacking anaplastology care. While new skills are required for data acquisition and algorithm control, these technologies are increasingly accessible. Further clinical studies will help validate its effectiveness, and ongoing technological advancements may lead to even more advanced and skill-independent prosthesis fabrication methods in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.