ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024
A risk prediction model for delayed bleeding after ESD for gastric precancerous lesions.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy of Fibrin Sealants and Polyglycolic Acid Sheets in Reducing Postoperative Hemorrhage Following Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Saudi medical journal · 2025Pooled it
- Endoscopic Hand Suturing After Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Patients with Low to Intermediate Risk of Delayed Bleeding: A Retrospective Pilot Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Observational
- Prediction of delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions by BEST-C score.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Risk Prediction for Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Precancerous Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence: Retrospective Clinical Trial.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2026Article
- Predicting post-ESD bleeding in elderly patients with early gastrointestinal cancer: an explainable model based on endoscopic features.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Stratified and propensity score matching analysis of the effectiveness of fibrin glue in preventing postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Risk modeling of delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Meta-analysis of predictive factors for delayed hemorrhage after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Early prediction of acute pancreatitis with acute kidney injury using abdominal contrast-enhanced CT features.iScience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the risk factors for delayed postoperative bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with gastric precancerous lesions and to construct a risk prediction model.
methodsThis retrospective analysis included clinical data from patients with gastric precancerous lesions who underwent ESD at Wuhan University People's Hospital between November 2016 and June 2022. An XGBoost model was built to predict delayed bleeding after ESD using risk factors identified by univariable and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), and SHapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to interpret the model.
resultsSeven factors were statistically associated with delayed postoperative bleeding in gastric precancerous lesions after ESD: age, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, hypertension, lesion size ≥ 40 mm, operative time ≥ 120 min, female, and nonuse of hemoclips. A risk prediction model was established. In the training cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.97 (0.96-0.98), a sensitivity of 0.90, a specificity of 0.94, and an F1 score of 0.91. In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.94(0.90-0.98), with a sensitivity of 0.85, a specificity of 0.89, and an F1 score of 0.85. In the test cohort, the AUC was 0.94 (0.89-0.99), the sensitivity was 0.80, the specificity was 0.92, and the F1 score was 0.84, indicating strong predictive capability.
conclusionIn this study, an XGBoost prediction model for assessing the risk of delayed postoperative bleeding after ESD in patients with gastric precancerous lesions was developed and validated. This model can be applied in clinical practice to effectively predict the risk of post-ESD bleeding for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38844732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.