Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844709›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2024

Breaking new ground: can artificial intelligence and machine learning transform papillary glioneuronal tumor diagnosis?

Hanzala Ahmed Farooqi, Rayyan Nabi, Tabeer Zahid, Zeeshan Hayder

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanzala Ahmed FarooqiIslamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Rayyan NabiIslamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. drrayyannabi03@gmail.com.
Tabeer ZahidFoundation University Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Zeeshan HayderIslamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papillary glioneuronal tumors (PGNTs), classified as Grade I by the WHO in 2016, present diagnostic challenges due to their rarity and potential for malignancy. Xiaodan Du et al.'s recent study of 36 confirmed PGNT cases provides critical insights into their imaging characteristics, revealing frequent presentation with headaches, seizures, and mass effect symptoms, predominantly located in the supratentorial region near the lateral ventricles. Lesions often appeared as mixed cystic and solid masses with septations or as cystic masses with mural nodules. Given these complexities, artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer promising advancements for PGNT diagnosis. Previous studies have demonstrated AI's efficacy in diagnosing various brain tumors, utilizing deep learning and advanced imaging techniques for rapid and accurate identification. Implementing AI in PGNT diagnosis involves assembling comprehensive datasets, preprocessing data, extracting relevant features, and iteratively training models for optimal performance. Despite AI's potential, medical professionals must validate AI predictions, ensuring they complement rather than replace clinical expertise. This integration of AI and ML into PGNT diagnostics could significantly enhance preoperative accuracy, ultimately improving patient outcomes through more precise and timely interventions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBrain NeoplasmsMachine LearningGliomaHumansArtificial Intelligence (AI)Brain tumor diagnosisMachine learning (ML)Papillary Glioneuronal Tumor (PGNT)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.