ArticleScientific reports2024
A fully automated classification of third molar development stages using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing an Indian dataset with BioAlder using Demirjian's staging of the third molar.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Reliability of the QUADAS-2 checklist in AI-based medical imaging: A comparison of human reviewers and ChatGPT-4o.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Across Dental Developmental Stages and the 18-Year Age Threshold Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First-stage assessment of AI-based anatomical measurement accuracy for the Cameriere European dental age estimation method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based dental age classification from panoramic radiographs: a multi-granularity, multi-model comparative study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Dental age estimation: a scoping review comparing the manual application of the Demirjian method and artificial intelligence modalities.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Radiographic legal age estimation based on third molar development using Machine-learning algorithms.PloS one · 2026Article
- Automated diagnosis for extraction difficulty of maxillary and mandibular third molars and post-extraction complications using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated classification of midpalatal suture maturation stages from CBCTs using an end-to-end deep learning framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of an AI-Supported Clinical Tool for Assessing Mandibular Third Molar Tooth Extraction Difficulty Using Panoramic Radiographs and YOLO11 Sub-Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Prediction Model for External Root Resorption of the Second Molars Associated With Third Molars.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Automatic Detection of Acute Leukemia (ALL and AML) Utilizing Customized Deep Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate classification of tooth development stages from orthopantomograms (OPG) is crucial for dental diagnosis, treatment planning, age assessment, and forensic applications. This study aims to develop an automated method for classifying third molar development stages using OPGs. Initially, our data consisted of 3422 OPG images, each classified and curated by expert evaluators. The dataset includes images from both Q3 (lower jaw left side) and Q4 (lower right side) regions extracted from panoramic images, resulting in a total of 6624 images for analysis. Following data collection, the methodology employs region of interest extraction, pre-filtering, and extensive data augmentation techniques to enhance classification accuracy. The deep neural network model, including architectures such as EfficientNet, EfficientNetV2, MobileNet Large, MobileNet Small, ResNet18, and ShuffleNet, is optimized for this task. Our findings indicate that EfficientNet achieved the highest classification accuracy at 83.7%. Other architectures achieved accuracies ranging from 71.57 to 82.03%. The variation in performance across architectures highlights the influence of model complexity and task-specific features on classification accuracy. This research introduces a novel machine learning model designed to accurately estimate the development stages of lower wisdom teeth in OPG images, contributing to the fields of dental diagnostics and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.