Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844449›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A machine learning contest enhances automated freezing of gait detection and reveals time-of-day effects.

Amit Salomon, Eran Gazit, Pieter Ginis, Baurzhan Urazalinov, Hirokazu Takoi, Taiki Yamaguchi, Shuhei Goda, David Lander, Julien Lacombe, Aditya Kumar Sinha and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Amit SalomonCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eran GazitCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Pieter GinisKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Science, Neuromotor Rehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Leuven, Belgium.
Hirokazu Takoi
Taiki Yamaguchi
David Lander
Aditya Kumar Sinha
Alice NieuwboerKU Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Science, Neuromotor Rehabilitation Research Group (eNRGy), Leuven, Belgium.
Leslie C KirschMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5874-1593
Ryan HolbrookKaggle, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1881-6883
Brad ManorHinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research at Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA.
Jeffrey M HausdorffCenter for the Study of Movement, Cognition and Mobility, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. jhausdor@tlvmc.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1608-0776

Funding

Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research (Michael J. Fox Foundation) MJFF-023293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freezing of gait (FOG) is a debilitating problem that markedly impairs the mobility and independence of 38-65% of people with Parkinson's disease. During a FOG episode, patients report that their feet are suddenly and inexplicably "glued" to the floor. The lack of a widely applicable, objective FOG detection method obstructs research and treatment. To address this problem, we organized a 3-month machine-learning contest, inviting experts from around the world to develop wearable sensor-based FOG detection algorithms. 1,379 teams from 83 countries submitted 24,862 solutions. The winning solutions demonstrated high accuracy, high specificity, and good precision in FOG detection, with strong correlations to gold-standard references. When applied to continuous 24/7 data, the solutions revealed previously unobserved patterns in daily living FOG occurrences. This successful endeavor underscores the potential of machine learning contests to rapidly engage AI experts in addressing critical medical challenges and provides a promising means for objective FOG quantification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGaitMachine LearningParkinson DiseaseFemaleGait Disorders, NeurologicHumansMaleWearable Electronic Devices

Identifiers

PMID38844449
PMCPMC11156937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.