Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844398›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Loneliness in the Digital World: protocol for a co-produced ecological momentary assessment study in adolescents.

Zhuoni Xiao, Sarah Robertson, Emily Long, Robin Flaig, Liz Kirby, Liana Romaniuk, Aja Murray, Heather Whalley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Constructs, Predictive Factors and Measures: Insights From the Mental Health in the Moment (MHIM) Co-Production Panel.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhuoni XiaoCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK zxiao@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2030-6045
Sarah RobertsonCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Emily LongSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Robin FlaigCentre for Medical Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liz KirbyCentre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Liana RomaniukCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aja Murray *Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-3188
Heather Whalley *Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4505-8869

Funding

Medical Research CouncilWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLoneliness has been identified as an important public health issue, peaking during adolescence. Previous research has suggested that social interaction is a key factor in loneliness, and positive social interaction can act as a protective factor against loneliness. However, it is unclear whether there are differing impacts of in-person and online social interaction on adolescents' loneliness and mental health. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) designs are ideally suited for better understanding these associations. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: In the 'Loneliness in the Digital World' study, we will use a co-developed EMA design to capture daily social interactions, loneliness and mental health such as positive and negative emotions, depression and anxiety in approximately 200 adolescents aged 12-15 years. We will combine this with comprehensive information gathered from online surveys. Analysing the data using techniques such as dynamic structural equation modelling, we will examine, among other research questions, the associations between online and in-person social interaction and feelings of loneliness. The results can help inform interventions to support adolescents with high levels of loneliness and poor mental health. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We received the ethics approval for the data collection from The Academic and Clinical Central Office for Research and Development, followed by the College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine Ethics panel at University of Edinburgh, and finally reviewed by East of Scotland Research Ethics Service. The results will be disseminated through journal publications, conferences and seminar presentations and to relevant stakeholders such as teachers.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentLonelinessMental HealthAdolescentAnxietyChildDepressionFemaleHumansMaleResearch DesignScotlandSocial InteractionSurveys and Questionnaireschild & adolescent psychiatrymental healthpsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID38844398
PMCPMC11163606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.