ArticleThe Science of the total environment2024
Developmental perfluorooctane sulfonic acid exposure exacerbates house dust mite induced allergic responses in adult mice.
Article in The Science of the total environment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Status of Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposure on Lung Cell Biology and Pulmonary Outcomes along Human Health Risk Assessment Steps.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2026Review
- PPAR-gamma regulates PFAS-mediated proinflammatory cytokines in lung epithelial cells.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- New insights into the effects of PFOS exposure on rat lung development: morphological, functional, and single-cell sequencing analysis.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is a long-chain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS), a persistent organic pollutant, which has been used in aqueous film-forming foams. Emerging epidemiological evidence indicates a significant body burden of PFOS is observed in the lungs. Furthermore, developmental PFOS exposure dysregulates lung development and exacerbates eosinophilic inflammation, which are critical risk factors for asthma. However, it is unknown whether PFOS exerts sex-dependent effects on house dust mite (HDM) induced asthmatic progression and allergic inflammation. In this study, timed pregnant Balb/cJ dams were dosed orally via PFOS (1.0 mg/kg/d) spiked or vehicle control mealworms from gestational day (GD) 0.5 to postnatal day (PND) 21. Subsequently, HDM (30 μg/day) was administered starting at PND 77-82 for 10 days, and the mice were sacrificed 48 h after their final treatment. The serum and lung PFOS concentrations were 3.391 ± 0.189 μg/mL and 3.567 ± 0.1676 μg/g in the offspring, respectively. Male mice exposed to PFOS + HDM showed higher total cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), macrophage counts, and eosinophil counts compared to mice exposed to HDM alone. Female mice exposed to PFOS + HDM had increased BALF eosinophil percentage, mucous production, alternatively activated (M2) macrophage polarization, and M2-associated gene expression compared to female mice exposed to HDM alone. PFOS exposure had no significant effect on HDM-induced IL-4, IL-5, or IL-13, but RANTES was further elevated in female mice. Overall, our data suggest that developmental PFOS exposure increased the risk of exacerbated eosinophilic inflammation and M2 polarization, which were more severe in female mice, suggesting sex-dependent developmental effects of PFOS on allergic airway responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.