ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2024
Discrimination in Medical Settings across Populations: Evidence From the All of Us Research Program.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Everyday and healthcare discrimination and polysubstance use among U.S. adults.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- Everyday Discrimination and Health Care Utilization Among US Adults.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Association Between Discrimination in Health Care and ASCVD Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Perceived Discrimination in Healthcare Among United States Middle-aged and Older Adults.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Geographic Variation in Racial Disparities in Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates in Mississippi.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Health Literacy and Awareness of Family Health History in the All of Us Research Program.Public health genomics · 2026Article
- Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Is Associated With Adverse Social Factors: An Analysis UsingGastro hep advances · 2026Article
- Perceived prejudice or discrimination in medical care among US adults.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Leveraging the Transitional Care Model Intervention to Identify and Mitigate Adverse Social Determinants of Health.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2025Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perceived Healthcare Discrimination and Health Outcomes.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Time to use large-scale biobank databases in health policy and public health research.Health affairs scholar · 2025Article
- Use of calibration to improve the precision of estimates obtained from All of Us data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiscrimination in medical settings (DMS) contributes to healthcare disparities in the United States, but few studies have determined the extent of DMS in a large national sample and across different populations. This study estimated the national prevalence of DMS and described demographic and health-related characteristics associated with experiencing DMS in seven different situations.
methodsSurvey data from 41,875 adults participating in the All of Us Research Program collected in 2021-2022 and logistic regression were used to examine the association between sociodemographic and health-related characteristics and self-reported DMS among adults engaged with a healthcare provider within the past 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed in 2023-2024.
resultsAbout 36.89% of adults reported having experienced at least one DMS situation. Adults with relative social and medical disadvantages had higher prevalence of experiencing DMS. Compared to their counterparts, respondents with higher odds of experiencing DMS in at least one situation identified as female, non-Hispanic Black, having at least some college, living in the South, renter, having other living arrangement, being publicly insured, not having a usual source of care, having multiple chronic conditions, having any disability, and reporting fair or poor health, p<0.05.
conclusionsThe findings indicate a high prevalence of DMS, particularly among some population groups. Characterizing DMS may be a valuable tool for identifying populations at risk within the healthcare system and optimizing the overall patient care experience. Implementing relevant policies remains an essential strategy for mitigating the prevalence of DMS and reducing healthcare disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.