Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38844122›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2025

Multi-task aquatic toxicity prediction model based on multi-level features fusion.

Xin Yang, Jianqiang Sun, Bingyu Jin, Yuer Lu, Jinyan Cheng, Jiaju Jiang, Qi Zhao, Jianwei Shuai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xin YangSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China; Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China.
Jianqiang SunSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China.
Bingyu JinSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China.
Yuer LuWenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China.
Jinyan ChengWenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China.
Jiaju JiangCollege of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China.
Qi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China. Electronic address: zhaoqi@lnu.edu.cn.
Jianwei ShuaiWenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou 325001, China; Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health), Wenzhou 325001, China. Electronic address: shuaijw@wiucas.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the escalating menace of organic compounds in environmental pollution imperiling the survival of aquatic organisms, the investigation of organic compound toxicity across diverse aquatic species assumes paramount significance for environmental protection. Understanding how different species respond to these compounds helps assess the potential ecological impact of pollution on aquatic ecosystems as a whole. Compared with traditional experimental methods, deep learning methods have higher accuracy in predicting aquatic toxicity, faster data processing speed and better generalization ability.

objectivesThis article presents ATFPGT-multi, an advanced multi-task deep neural network prediction model for organic toxicity.

methodsThe model integrates molecular fingerprints and molecule graphs to characterize molecules, enabling the simultaneous prediction of acute toxicity for the same organic compound across four distinct fish species. Furthermore, to validate the advantages of multi-task learning, we independently construct prediction models, named ATFPGT-single, for each fish species. We employ cross-validation in our experiments to assess the performance and generalization ability of ATFPGT-multi.

resultsThe experimental results indicate, first, that ATFPGT-multi outperforms ATFPGT-single on four fish datasets with AUC improvements of 9.8%, 4%, 4.8%, and 8.2%, respectively, demonstrating the superiority of multi-task learning over single-task learning. Furthermore, in comparison with previous algorithms, ATFPGT-multi outperforms comparative methods, emphasizing that our approach exhibits higher accuracy and reliability in predicting aquatic toxicity. Moreover, ATFPGT-multi utilizes attention scores to identify molecular fragments associated with fish toxicity in organic molecules, as demonstrated by two organic molecule examples in the main text, demonstrating the interpretability of ATFPGT-multi.

conclusionIn summary, ATFPGT-multi provides important support and reference for the further development of aquatic toxicity assessment. All of codes and datasets are freely available online at https://github.com/zhaoqi106/ATFPGT-multi.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsOrganic ChemicalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsDeep LearningEcosystemFishesNeural Networks, ComputerOrganic ChemicalsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcute toxicityDeep learningMolecular fingerprintsMolecular graph featuresMulti-task model

Identifiers

PMID38844122
PMCPMC11785906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.