Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38843905›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2024

Prevalence and outcomes of patients with SMuRF-less acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Jocasta Ball, Diem T Dinh, Angela Brennan, Andrew Ajani, David J Clark, Melanie Freeman, Ernesto Oqueli, Chin Hiew, Shane Nanayakkara, Antony Walton and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jocasta BallCentre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia jocasta.ball@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-4255
Diem T DinhCentre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Angela BrennanCentre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew AjaniMelbourne Private Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David J ClarkDepartment of Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Melanie FreemanEastern Health, Box HIll, Victoria, Australia.
Ernesto OqueliGrampians Health Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Chin HiewGeelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Shane NanayakkaraBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Antony WaltonBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
James A ShawDepartment of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9045-9119
William ChanDepartment of Cardiology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9684-888X
Christopher M ReidCentre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dion StubCentre of Cardiovascular Research and Education in Therapeutics, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing awareness that patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs; diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension and smoking) may represent a unique subset of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and outcomes of patients with SMuRF-less ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with those with SMuRFs.

methodsWe analysed data from the Melbourne Interventional Group PCI Registry. Patients with coronary artery disease were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital and 30-day events. Long-term mortality was investigated using Cox-proportional hazards regression.

resultsFrom 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2020, 2727/18 988 (14.4%) patients were SMuRF less, with the proportion increasing over time. Mean age was similar for patients with and without SMuRFs (63 years), and fewer females were SMuRF-less (19.8% vs 25.4%, p<0.001). SMuRF-less patients were more likely to present with cardiac arrest (6.6% vs 3.9%, p<0.001) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (59.1% vs 50.8%, p<0.001) and were more likely to experience postprocedural cardiogenic shock (4.5% vs 3.6%, p=0.019) and arrhythmia (11.2% vs 9.9%, p=0.029). At 30 days, mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events did not differ between the groups. During median follow-up of 7 years, SMuRF-less patients had an adjusted 13% decreased rate of mortality (HR 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.97)).

conclusionsThe proportion of SMuRF-less patients increased over time. Presentation was more often a devastating cardiac event compared with those with SMuRFs. No difference in 30-day outcomes was observed and SMuRF-less patients had lower hazard for long-term mortality.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateTime FactorsAcute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRISK FACTORS

Identifiers

PMID38843905
PMCPMC11163639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.