Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38843852›Full record

Observational studyThe Lancet. Child & adolescent health2024

PECARN prediction rule for cervical spine imaging of children presenting to the emergency department with blunt trauma: a multicentre prospective observational study.

Julie C Leonard, Monica Harding, Lawrence J Cook, Jeffrey R Leonard, Kathleen M Adelgais, Fahd A Ahmad, Lorin R Browne, Rebecca K Burger, Pradip P Chaudhari, Daniel J Corwin and 12 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Lancet. Child & adolescent health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05049330 (Development and Testing of a Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Assessment Tool), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05049330 completednot on this map

Development and Testing of a Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Assessment Tool

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorJulie LeonardRan2018 to 2023Enrolled22,444ConditionsCervical Spine Injury
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Acute management of spinal fractures: What you need to know.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Analysis of Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Evaluation Workflow in the Emergency Department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Reducing radiation exposure in pediatric cervical spine imaging for trauma: a multi-disciplinary quality improvement initiative.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Julie C LeonardDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: julie.leonard@nationwidechildrens.org.
Monica HardingDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Lawrence J CookDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jeffrey R LeonardDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kathleen M AdelgaisSection of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Colorado Children's Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
Fahd A AhmadDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.
Lorin R BrowneDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Rebecca K BurgerDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pradip P ChaudhariDivision of Emergency and Transport Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel J CorwinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nicolaus W GlombDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, University of California, Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Lois K LeeDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sylvia Owusu-AnsahDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Lauren C RineyDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Alexander J RogersDepartment of Emergency Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, CS Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel M RubalcavaDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Robert E SapienDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Matthew A SzadkowskiDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Leah TzimenatosDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Caleb E WardDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth YenDivision of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Health Dallas, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Nathan KuppermannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

Development and Testing of a Pediatric Cervical Spine Injury Risk Assessment ToolR01HD091347 · NICHD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI LEONARD, JULIE C. · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical spine injuries in children are uncommon but potentially devastating; however, indiscriminate neck imaging after trauma unnecessarily exposes children to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to derive and validate a paediatric clinical prediction rule that can be incorporated into an algorithm to guide radiographic screening for cervical spine injury among children in the emergency department.

methodsIn this prospective observational cohort study, we screened children aged 0-17 years presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma at 18 specialised children's emergency departments in hospitals in the USA affiliated with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Injured children were eligible for enrolment into derivation or validation cohorts by fulfilling one of the following criteria: transported from the scene of injury to the emergency department by emergency medical services; evaluated by a trauma team; and undergone neck imaging for concern for cervical spine injury either at or before arriving at the PECARN-affiliated emergency department. Children presenting with solely penetrating trauma were excluded. Before viewing an enrolled child's neck imaging results, the attending emergency department clinician completed a clinical examination and prospectively documented cervical spine injury risk factors in an electronic questionnaire. Cervical spine injuries were determined by imaging reports and telephone follow-up with guardians within 21-28 days of the emergency room encounter, and cervical spine injury was confirmed by a paediatric neurosurgeon. Factors associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury (>10%) were identified by bivariable Poisson regression with robust error estimates, and factors associated with non-negligible risk were identified by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Variables were combined in the cervical spine injury prediction rule. The primary outcome of interest was cervical spine injury within 28 days of initial trauma warranting inpatient observation or surgical intervention. Rule performance measures were calculated for both derivation and validation cohorts. A clinical care algorithm for determining which risk factors warrant radiographic screening for cervical spine injury after blunt trauma was applied to the study population to estimate the potential effect on reducing CT and x-ray use in the paediatric emergency department. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05049330.

findingsNine emergency departments participated in the derivation cohort, and nine participated in the validation cohort. In total, 22 430 children presenting with known or suspected blunt trauma were enrolled (11 857 children in the derivation cohort; 10 573 in the validation cohort). 433 (1·9%) of the total population had confirmed cervical spine injuries. The following factors were associated with a high risk of cervical spine injury: altered mental status (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score of 3-8 or unresponsive on the Alert, Verbal, Pain, Unresponsive scale [AVPU] of consciousness); abnormal airway, breathing, or circulation findings; and focal neurological deficits including paresthesia, numbness, or weakness. Of 928 in the derivation cohort presenting with at least one of these risk factors, 118 (12·7%) had cervical spine injury (risk ratio 8·9 [95% CI 7·1-11·2]). The following factors were associated with non-negligible risk of cervical spine injury by CART analysis: neck pain; altered mental status (GCS score of 9-14; verbal or pain on the AVPU; or other signs of altered mental status); substantial head injury; substantial torso injury; and midline neck tenderness. The high-risk and CART-derived factors combined and applied to the validation cohort performed with 94·3% (95% CI 90·7-97·9) sensitivity, 60·4% (59·4-61·3) specificity, and 99·9% (99·8-100·0) negative predictive value. Had the algorithm been applied to all participants to guide the use of imaging, we estimated the number of children having CT might have decreased from 3856 (17·2%) to 1549 (6·9%) of 22 430 children without increasing the number of children getting plain x-rays.

interpretationIncorporated into a clinical algorithm, the cervical spine injury prediction rule showed strong potential for aiding clinicians in determining which children arriving in the emergency department after blunt trauma should undergo radiographic neck imaging for potential cervical spine injury. Implementation of the clinical algorithm could decrease use of unnecessary radiographic testing in the emergency department and eliminate high-risk radiation exposure. Future work should validate the prediction rule and care algorithm in more general settings such as community emergency departments.

fundingThe Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Health Resources and Services Administration of the US Department of Health and Human Services in the Maternal and Child Health Bureau under the Emergency Medical Services for Children programme.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeClinical Decision RulesEmergency Service, HospitalSpinal InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingAdolescentAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProspective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID38843852
PMCPMC11261431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.