Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38843469›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2024

Nanoliposomal Irinotecan With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin or Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase II Study of the AIO Hepatobiliary-YMO Cancer Groups (NIFE-AIO-YMO HEP-0315).

Thomas J Ettrich, Dominik P Modest, Marianne Sinn, Jana K Striefler, Bernhard Opitz, Thorsten Goetze, Eike Gallmeier, Stefan Angermeier, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Lutz Jacobasch and 15 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Thomas J EttrichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7654-2442
Dominik P ModestHematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6853-0599
Marianne SinnDepartment of Oncology, Hematology and BMT with Division of Pneumology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7155-1278
Jana K StrieflerHematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bernhard OpitzDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital St Elisabeth and St Barbara Halle, Halle, Germany.
Thorsten GoetzeInstitute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Northwest Hospital, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Eike GallmeierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Stefan AngermeierDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hematology and Oncology, Ludwigsburg Hospital, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Ludwig Fischer von WeikersthalDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, St Marien Hospital, Amberg, Germany.
Lutz JacobaschPrivate Practice Oncology/Hematology, Dresden, Germany.
Dirk WaldschmidtDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael NiedermeierPrivate Practice Oncology/Hematology, Memmingen, Germany.
Michael SohmPrivate Practice Oncology/Hematology, Landshut, Germany.
Andreas W BergerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Giulia ManziniDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Swiss.ORCID 0000-0002-8032-8043
Uli FehrenbachClinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Timo Alexander AuerClinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Clarissa HosseClinic for Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4383-5716
Daniel VogeleDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Disorn SookthaiBiostatistics-Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Northwest Hospital, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Marina SchaafBiostatistics-Institute of Clinical Cancer Research (IKF) at Northwest Hospital, UCT-University Cancer Center, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Rainer MucheInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Axel HinkeBiostatistics, CCRC Cancer Clinical Research Consulting, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-8836
Thomas SeufferleinDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Lukas PerkhoferDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-0974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFirst-line therapy options in advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are based on the ABC-02 trial regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin [G/C]). The NIFE trial examined nanoliposomal irinotecan/fluorouracil/leucovorin (nal-IRI/FU/LV) as alternative first-line therapy in advanced CCA.

methodsNIFE is a prospective, open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II study that aimed at detecting efficacy comparable with the standard treatment. Patients with advanced CCA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (arm A) or G/C (arm B). Stratification parameters were intrahepatic versus extrahepatic CCA, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG; 0/1). Arm A was designed as a Simon's optimal two-stage design and arm B served as a randomized control group. The primary goal was to exclude an inferior progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months of only 40%, while assuming a rate of 60% on G/C population.

resultsBetween 2018 and 2020, overall 91 patients were randomly assigned to receive nal-IRI/FU/LV (n = 49) or G/C (n = 42). The NIFE trial formally met its primary end point with a 4-month PFS rate of 51% in patients receiving nal-IRI/FU/LV. The median PFS was 6 months (2.4-9.6) in arm A and 6.9 months (2.5-7.9) in arm B. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 months (10.6-20.3) in arm A and 13.6 months (6.5-17.7) in arm B. The exploratory comparison of study arms suggested a numerical but statistically not significant advantage for nal-IRI/FU/LV (hazard ratio for PFS, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.53 to 1.38] and for OS, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.58 to 1.50]). Analysis for stratification parameters revealed no differences for sex and ECOG, but for tumor localization. The objective response rate was 24.5% with nal-IRI/FU/LV and 11.9% with G/C. No unexpected toxicities occurred. AEs related to nal-IRI/FU/LV were mainly GI and to G/C hematologic.

conclusionTreatment of advanced CCA with nal-IRI/FU/LV demonstrated efficacy in first-line therapy without new safety findings and merits further validation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaCisplatinDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinLiposomesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCisplatinDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinLiposomes

Identifiers

PMID38843469
PMCPMC11379362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.