ArticleBlood advances2024
A simplified G-CSF-free procedure allows for in vivo HSC gene therapy of sickle cell disease in a mouse model.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Gene Therapy of Beta Hemoglobinopathies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Exploring MSC and HSPC interactions: new frontiers in hematopoiesis and transplant medicine.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Review
- GroβT rapidly and reliably mobilizes primitive hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in nonhuman primates.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Article
- Treating genetic blood disorders in the era of CRISPR-mediated genome editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Genome editing strategies for targeted correction of β-globin mutation in sickle cell disease: From bench to bedside.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Introducing a hemoglobin G-Makassar variant in HSCs by in vivo base editing treats sickle cell disease in mice.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
- Auto-expansion ofMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractWe have reported the direct repair of the sickle cell mutation in vivo in a disease model using vectorized prime editors after hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)/AMD3100. The use of G-CSF for HSC mobilization is a hurdle for the clinical translation of this approach. Here, we tested a G-CSF-free mobilization regimen using WU-106, an inhibitor of integrin α4β1, plus AMD3100 for in vivo HSC prime editing in sickle cell disease (SCD) mice. Mobilization with WU-106 + AMD3100 in SCD mice was rapid and efficient. In contrast to the G-CSF/AMD3100 approach, mobilization of activated granulocytes and elevation of the key proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 in the serum were minimal. The combination of WU-106 + AMD3100 mobilization and IV injection of the prime editing vector together with in vivo selection resulted in ∼23% correction of the SCD mutation in the bone marrow and peripheral blood cells of SCD mice. The treated mice demonstrated phenotypic correction, as reflected by normalized blood parameters and spleen size. Editing frequencies were significantly increased (29%) in secondary recipients, indicating the preferential mobilization/transduction of long-term repopulating HSCs. Using this approach, we found <1% undesired insertions/deletions and no detectable off-target editing at the top-scored potential sites. Our study shows that in vivo transduction to treat SCD can now be done within 2 hours involving only simple IV injections with a good safety profile. The same-day mobilization regimen makes in vivo HSC gene therapy more attractive for resource-poor settings, where SCD does the most damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.