ArticlePloS one2024
Automated free speech analysis reveals distinct markers of Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surprisal from Large Language Models as an individual difference: Capturing the individual regardless of the text answer.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The include network: Advancing cross-linguistic equity in brain health research.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Speech-based digital biomarkers for early etiological stratification of Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal degeneration: a biomarker-confirmed prospective study.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2026Article
- Benchmarking speech biomarkers of Alzheimer's against cognitive and neural measures.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Digital language measures capture episodic memory disruptions in people with human immunodeficiency virus: A machine learning study.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2026Article
- The landscape of dementia research, diagnosis, treatment, and care in Latin America.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Spontaneous speech enables scalable digital phenotyping of physical functional deficits in aging.npj aging · 2026Article
- Multi-level language deficits in behavioural frontotemporal degeneration and related disorders.Brain communications · 2026Article
- A systematic review of explainable artificial intelligence methods for speech-based cognitive decline detection.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Can Frontal Assessment Battery Discriminate between Patients with Alzheimer's and Frontotemporal Dementia?Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025Article
- Cognitive Phenotyping of Parkinson's Disease Patients Via Digital Analysis of Spoken Word Properties.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025Article
- Automated Speech Markers of Alzheimer Dementia: Test of Cross-Linguistic Generalizability.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Automated Speech Analysis to Differentiate Frontal and Right Anterior Temporal Lobe Atrophy in Frontotemporal Dementia.Neurology · 2025Article
- The structure of spontaneous speech changes in Alzheimer's disease: Crosslingual evidence from English and Greek.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dementia can disrupt how people experience and describe events as well as their own role in them. Alzheimer's disease (AD) compromises the processing of entities expressed by nouns, while behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) entails a depersonalized perspective with increased third-person references. Yet, no study has examined whether these patterns can be captured in connected speech via natural language processing tools. To tackle such gaps, we asked 96 participants (32 AD patients, 32 bvFTD patients, 32 healthy controls) to narrate a typical day of their lives and calculated the proportion of nouns, verbs, and first- or third-person markers (via part-of-speech and morphological tagging). We also extracted objective properties (frequency, phonological neighborhood, length, semantic variability) from each content word. In our main study (with 21 AD patients, 21 bvFTD patients, and 21 healthy controls), we used inferential statistics and machine learning for group-level and subject-level discrimination. The above linguistic features were correlated with patients' scores in tests of general cognitive status and executive functions. We found that, compared with HCs, (i) AD (but not bvFTD) patients produced significantly fewer nouns, (ii) bvFTD (but not AD) patients used significantly more third-person markers, and (iii) both patient groups produced more frequent words. Machine learning analyses showed that these features identified individuals with AD and bvFTD (AUC = 0.71). A generalizability test, with a model trained on the entire main study sample and tested on hold-out samples (11 AD patients, 11 bvFTD patients, 11 healthy controls), showed even better performance, with AUCs of 0.76 and 0.83 for AD and bvFTD, respectively. No linguistic feature was significantly correlated with cognitive test scores in either patient group. These results suggest that specific cognitive traits of each disorder can be captured automatically in connected speech, favoring interpretability for enhanced syndrome characterization, diagnosis, and monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.