ArticlePloS one2024
Factors influencing the efficacy of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator: Implications for ischemic stroke treatment.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies to overcome hepatic clearance of endogenous proteins - molecular and formulation approaches.RSC chemical biology · 2026Review
- Thrombolytic proteins profiling: High-throughput activity, selectivity, and resistance assays.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Optimizing Stroke Pathways: An Observational Audit of Door-to-CT Time, Thrombolysis, and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Article
- Computer-aided engineering of staphylokinase toward enhanced affinity and selectivity for plasmin.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis with a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the first-line treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, successful recanalization is relatively low and the underlying processes are not completely understood. The goal was to provide insights into clinically important factors potentially limiting rt-PA efficacy such as clot size, rt-PA concentration, clot age and also rt-PA in combination with heparin anticoagulant. We established a static in vitro thrombolytic model based on red blood cell (RBC) dominant clots prepared using spontaneous clotting from the blood of healthy donors. Thrombolysis was determined by clot mass loss and by RBC release. The rt-PA became increasingly less efficient for clots larger than 50 μl at a clinically relevant concentration of 1.3 mg/l. A tenfold decrease or increase in concentration induced only a 2-fold decrease or increase in clot degradation. Clot age did not affect rt-PA-induced thrombolysis but 2-hours-old clots were degraded more readily due to higher activity of spontaneous thrombolysis, as compared to 5-hours-old clots. Finally, heparin (50 and 100 IU/ml) did not influence the rt-PA-induced thrombolysis. Our study provided in vitro evidence for a clot size threshold: clots larger than 50 μl are hard to degrade by rt-PA. Increasing rt-PA concentration provided limited thrombolytic efficacy improvement, whereas heparin addition had no effect. However, the higher susceptibility of younger clots to thrombolysis may prompt a shortened time from the onset of stroke to rt-PA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.