Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38843171›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Evaluating an equity-focused approach to assess climate resilience and disaster priorities through a community survey.

Samantha Lovell, Jamie Vickery, Paulina López, Alberto J Rodríguez, B J Cummings, Kathleen Moloney, Jeffrey Berman, Ann Bostrom, Tania Busch Isaksen, Erika Estrada and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Samantha LovellDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jamie VickeryDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Paulina LópezDuwamish River Community Coalition, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alberto J RodríguezOffice of Sustainability & Environment, City of Seattle, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
B J CummingsDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kathleen MoloneyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jeffrey BermanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ann BostromEvans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Tania Busch IsaksenDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Erika EstradaExecutive Office of Resiliency and Health Security, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia, Washington, United States of America.
Cat HartwellDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4609-4554
Pamela KohlerDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
C Bradley KramerPublic Health - Seattle and King County, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Resham PatelDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-2974
Amy Helene SchnallDisaster Epidemiology & Response Team, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Mary Hannah SmithDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nicole A ErrettDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8247-8336

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ALI SHOJAIE · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the Duwamish Valley community in Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. and other environmental justice communities nationally contend with growing risks from climate change, there have been calls for a more community-centered approach to understanding impacts and priorities to inform resilience planning. To engage community members and identify climate justice and resilience priorities, a partnership of community leaders, government-based practitioners, and academics co-produced a survey instrument and collected data from the community using the Seattle Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (SASPER), an approach adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). In addition, we conducted a process and outcome project evaluation using quantitative survey data collected from volunteers and qualitative semi-structured interviews with project team members. In October and November 2022, teams of volunteers from partner organizations collected 162 surveys from households in the Duwamish Valley. Poor air quality, extreme heat, and wildfires were among the highest reported hazards of concern. Most Duwamish Valley households agreed or strongly agreed that their neighborhood has a strong sense of community (64%) and that they have people nearby to call when they need help (69%). Forty-seven percent of households indicated willingness to get involved with resilience planning, and 62% of households said that they would use a Resilience Hub during an emergency. Survey volunteers evaluated their participation positively, with over 85% agreeing or strongly agreeing that they learned new skills, were prepared for the survey, and would participate in future assessments. The evaluation interviews underscored that while the SASPER may have demonstrated feasibility in a pre-disaster phase, CASPER may not meet all community/partner needs in the immediate disaster response phase because of its lack of focus on equity and logistical requirements. Future research should focus on identifying less resource intensive data collection approaches that maintain the rigor and reputation of CASPER while enabling a focus on equity.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeAdultDisaster PlanningDisastersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesWashington

Identifiers

PMID38843171
PMCPMC11156407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.