Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38843118›Full record

Trial reportPreventing chronic disease2024

Reach and Weight Loss Among Comparison Group Participants Who Enrolled in the Active Intervention After a Diabetes Prevention Trial.

Tzeyu L Michaud, Cleo Zagurski, Kathryn E Wilson, Gwenndolyn C Porter, George Johnson, Paul A Estabrooks

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Preventing chronic disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tzeyu L MichaudDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Cleo ZagurskiDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Kathryn E WilsonDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, College of Education & Human Development, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Gwenndolyn C PorterDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
George JohnsonDepartment of Health Promotion, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Paul A EstabrooksDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined participation rates, engagement, and weight-loss outcomes of comparison group participants in a diabetes prevention trial who enrolled in a digitally delivered diabetes prevention program (ie, an active intervention) after the original trial ended. We evaluated these outcomes by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and 1-sample z test. We found a high participation rate (73%) among comparison group participants and comparable weight-loss outcomes at 12 months (6.8 lb) after initiating participation in the active intervention relative to intervention group participants during the original trial. Findings support providing evidence-based interventions for comparison or control group participants post-trial. Findings also support examining the cost-effectiveness of post-trial interventions, regardless of the limitations of acquiring post-trial data on weight in an uncontrolled setting.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Weight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID38843118
PMCPMC11192497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.