Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842757›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2024

Non-syndromic tooth agenesis in Latvian adolescent dental patients: a retrospective study with relevant literature review.

D Meistere, L Kronina, A Karkle, L Neimane

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D MeistereDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia. dita.meistere@stomatologijasinstituts.lv.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6047-8191
L KroninaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8445-8910
A KarkleDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2201-8060
L NeimaneDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5411-5810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate the prevalence of tooth agenesis and associated dental anomalies in Latvian adolescent dental patients and compare it to other European countries.

designCross-sectional study of 2692 11-to-14-year-old patients (39.9% males and 60.1% females) attending Riga Stradins University Institute of Stomatology with panoramic radiographs taken between August 2020 and September 2021. Patients with any genetic syndromes were excluded. Data on tooth agenesis (excluding third molars) and other dental anomalies were recorded.

resultsThe prevalence of tooth agenesis in Latvian adolescent dental patients was 9.3% with no statistically significant difference between genders (χ

conclusionsThis study found that the prevalence of non-syndromic tooth agenesis in Latvian adolescent dental patients was 9.3% with no statistically significant differences between the genders. Patients with tooth agenesis have a statistically significant possibility of the presence of other dental anomalies (p < 0.001).

Indexed as

AnodontiaAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLatviaMalePrevalenceRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective StudiesTooth AbnormalitiesCongenitally missing teethDental anomaliesHypodontiaOligodontiaPanoramic radiographTooth agenesis

Identifiers

PMID38842757
PMCPMC11233428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.