Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842606›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2024

Management of Localized Melanoma in the Anti-PD-1 Era.

Elan Novis, Alexander C J van Akkooi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04949113 (Multicenter Phase 3 Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Versus Standard Adjuvant Nivolumab in Macroscopic Stage III Melanoma - NADINA), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04949113 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

Multicenter Phase 3 Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab Versus Standard Adjuvant Nivolumab in Macroscopic Stage III Melanoma - NADINA

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteRan2021 to 2028Enrolled423ConditionsMalignant Melanoma Stage IIIArmsNeoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab, Adjuvant nivolumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elan NovisMelanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Road, Wollstonecraft, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.
Alexander C J van AkkooiMelanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rocklands Road, Wollstonecraft, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia. alexander.vanakkooi@melanoma.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe management of cutaneous melanoma has rapidly progressed over the past decade following the introduction of effective systemic therapies. Given the large number of recent clinical trials which have dramatically altered the management of these patients, an updated review of the current evidence regarding the management of localized melanoma is needed. RECENT

findingsThe role of effective systemic therapies in earlier stages (I-III) melanoma, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is rapidly changing the role of surgery in the management cutaneous melanoma, particularly regarding surgical safety margins for wide local excision (WLE), the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the extent of lymph node dissections. The randomized phase 2 SWOG1801 trial has demonstrated superiority of neoadjuvant-adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy in improving event-free survival by 23% at 2-years over adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy only. Furthermore, the PRADO trial has suggested a more tailored approach both the extent of surgery as well as adjuvant therapy can safely and effectively be done, depending on the response to initial neoadjuvant immunotherapy. These results await validation and it is expected that in 2024 the phase 3 Nadina trial (NCT04949113) will definitively establish neo-adjuvant combination immunotherapy as the novel standard. This will further redefine the management of localized melanoma. The use of effective systemic therapies will continue to evolve in the next decade and, together with new emerging diagnostic and surveillance techniques, will likely reduce the extent of routine surgery for stage I-III melanoma.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorSkin NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansImmunotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorAdjuvantCutaneous melanomaImmunotherapyLymph NodeNeoadjuvantSentinel NodeTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38842606
PMCPMC11300549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.