Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842523›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024

Current practices and challenges of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy: a narrative review.

Zenaw T Wolie, Jason A Roberts, Mark Gilchrist, Kate McCarthy, Fekade B Sime

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pharmacists in OPAT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zenaw T WolieUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.
Jason A RobertsUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6218-435X
Mark GilchristDepartment of Pharmacy/Infection, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kate McCarthyRoyal Brisbane Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-9659
Fekade B SimeUQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4061-2063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended hospitalization for infection management increases inpatient care costs and the risk of healthcare-associated adverse events, including infections. The growing global demand for healthcare, the diminishing availability of hospital beds and an increasing patient preference for care within their own home have been the primary drivers of the expansion of hospital-in-the-home programmes. Such programmes include the use of IV antimicrobials in outpatient settings, known as outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT). However, OPAT practices vary globally. This review article aims to describe the current OPAT practices and challenges worldwide. OPAT practice begins with patient evaluation and selection using eligibility criteria, which requires collaboration between the interdisciplinary OPAT team, patients and caregivers. Depending on care requirements, eligible patients may be enrolled to various models of care, receiving medication by healthcare professionals at outpatient infusion centres, hospital clinics, home visits or through self-administration. OPAT can be used for the management of many infections where an effective oral treatment option is lacking. Various classes of parenteral antimicrobials, including β-lactams, aminoglycosides, glycopeptides, fluoroquinolones and antifungals such as echinocandins, are used globally in OPAT practice. Despite its benefits, OPAT has numerous challenges, including complications from medication administration devices, antimicrobial side effects, monitoring requirements, antimicrobial instability, patient non-adherence, patient OPAT rejection, and challenges related to OPAT team structure and administration, all of which impact its outcome. A negative outcome could include unplanned hospital readmission. Future research should focus on mitigating these challenges to enable optimization of the OPAT service and thereby maximize the documented benefits for the healthcare system, patients and healthcare providers.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareAnti-Infective AgentsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansInfusions, ParenteralOutpatientsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID38842523
PMCPMC11368434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.