ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2024
Individual and Joint Associations of High-Sensitivity Troponin I and High-Sensitivity Troponin T with Cardiac Phenotypes and Outcomes in the General Population: An Analysis From the Dallas Heart Study.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biopsychosocial phenogroups in an urban population with coronary artery disease and their associations with adverse cardiovascular events.European heart journal open · 2026Article
- Correlation Between Cardiac Troponin Serum Concentration and Selected Parameters of Subclinical Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Patients With and Without Arterial Hypertension: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Real-World Data.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Heart Failure: A Step Forward.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2025Review
- The Link Between High Sensitivity Troponin T Levels and Outcomes Among Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study.Iranian journal of pathology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) and T (hs-cTnT) provide complementary information regarding cardiovascular disease risk. The explanation for their distinct risk profiles is incompletely understood. METHODS AND
resultshs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were measured in Dallas Heart Study participants. Associations of hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT with demographics and phenotypes were assessed using linear regression. Associations with incident heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, global cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were assessed using Cox models. Among 3276 participants (56% women, 50% Black persons, median age 43 years), the correlation between hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT was modest (Spearman rho=0.35). Variables associated with hs-cTnI but not hs-cTnT included hypertension, higher body mass index and total cholesterol, and lower high-density lipoprotein and cholesterol efflux capacity. Older age, male sex, and diabetes were positively associated, and smoking was negatively associated, with hs-cTnT but not hs-cTnI. Hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT were associated with heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] per SD log hs-cTnI 1.53 [95% CI, 1.30-1.81] and HR per SD log hs-cTnT 1.65 [95% CI, 1.40-1.95]), global cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.10-1.34] and HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.15-1.32]), and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.01-1.25], and HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.06-1.29]). After adjustment for N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and the alternative troponin, both remained associated with heart failure (HR per SD log hs-cTnI 1.32 [95% CI, 1.1-1.58] and HR per log hs-cTnT 1.27 [95% CI, 1.06-1.51]).
conclusionsHs-cTnI and hs-cTnT are modestly correlated, demonstrate differential associations with cardiac and metabolic phenotypes, and provide complementary information regarding heart failure risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.