Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842277›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Rule-based modulation of a sensorimotor transformation across cortical areas.

Yi-Ting Chang, Eric A Finkel, Duo Xu, Daniel H O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi-Ting ChangSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Brain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5327-250X
Eric A FinkelSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Brain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.
Duo XuSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Brain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8259-8688
Daniel H O'ConnorSolomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Brain Science Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-6714

Funding

Norepinephrine modulation of neocortex during flexible behaviorR01NS104834 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, JEREMIAH YAACOV, O'CONNOR, DANIEL HANS · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
Circuit and cellular dynamics in mouse cortex during tactile detectionR01NS089652 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI O'CONNOR, DANIEL HANS · 2014 to 2019
$2.1M
Kavli Foundation S-2021-GR-045Ministry of Education Government Scholarship to Study AbroadNINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS104834-01NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089652NINDS NIH HHS R01NS089652NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flexible responses to sensory stimuli based on changing rules are critical for adapting to a dynamic environment. However, it remains unclear how the brain encodes and uses rule information to guide behavior. Here, we made single-unit recordings while head-fixed mice performed a cross-modal sensory selection task where they switched between two rules: licking in response to tactile stimuli while rejecting visual stimuli, or vice versa. Along a cortical sensorimotor processing stream including the primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory areas, and the medial (MM) and anterolateral (ALM) motor areas, single-neuron activity distinguished between the two rules both prior to and in response to the tactile stimulus. We hypothesized that neural populations in these areas would show rule-dependent preparatory states, which would shape the subsequent sensory processing and behavior. This hypothesis was supported for the motor cortical areas (MM and ALM) by findings that (1) the current task rule could be decoded from pre-stimulus population activity; (2) neural subspaces containing the population activity differed between the two rules; and (3) optogenetic disruption of pre-stimulus states impaired task performance. Our findings indicate that flexible action selection in response to sensory input can occur via configuration of preparatory states in the motor cortex.

Indexed as

Motor CortexAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceNeuronsOptogeneticsSomatosensory CortexALMcross-modalmouseneuroscienceS1S2sensorimotorsensory selection

Identifiers

PMID38842277
PMCPMC11156468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.