Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38842196›Full record

ArticleThe journal of applied laboratory medicine2024

Minimally Invasive Blood Collection for an Mpox Serosurvey among People Experiencing Homelessness.

Caroline J Waddell, Gerald J Pellegrini, Neela Persad, Thomas D Filardo, Namrata Prasad, William C Carson, Terese Navarra, Michael B Townsend, Panayampalli S Satheshkumar, David Lowe and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of applied laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Caroline J WaddellMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5615-4920
Gerald J PellegriniMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Neela PersadMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Thomas D FilardoMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Namrata PrasadMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2268-279X
William C CarsonMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Terese NavarraMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michael B TownsendMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Panayampalli S SatheshkumarMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
David LoweMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Deborah BorneSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco City and County Government, CA, United States.
Nnenna OkoyeSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco City and County Government, CA, United States.
Julia JanssenSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco City and County Government, CA, United States.
Anamaría BejaranoSan Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco City and County Government, CA, United States.
Emily MositesMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2968-9564
Grace E MarxMpox Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople experiencing homelessness (PEH) are underrepresented in public health and clinical research. Study methods that can improve participation by this group are needed.

methodsIn late 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted an mpox serological survey using venipuncture among PEH in San Francisco, California. Blood collection by a minimally invasive device was offered if venipuncture was not possible or preferred. Participants who had a successful blood draw using the device were asked about device acceptability.

resultsOf the 209 successful blood collections, 137 (66%) were among participants who underwent venipuncture and 72 (34%) were among participants who used the device. Use of the device increased overall blood collection participation by 53%. Participants reported high acceptability and preference for the device over venipuncture.

conclusionsMinimally invasive blood collection devices may increase participation and representation of PEH in serosurveys.

Indexed as

Blood Specimen CollectionIll-Housed PersonsPhlebotomyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMpox, MonkeypoxSan FranciscoSeroepidemiologic Studies

Identifiers

PMID38842196
PMCPMC11869119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.