ArticleGut microbes
Antigenic operon fragmentation and diversification mechanism in
Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbial community of patients with Parkinson's disease analyzed using metagenome-assembled genomes.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Bioprospecting of the Phylum Bacteroidota for Sustainable Agriculture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dietary baking soda (NaHCORenal failure · 2025Article
- Rodent Gut Bacteria Coexisting with an Insect Gut Virus in Tapeworm Parasitic Cysts: Metagenomic Evidence of Microbial Selection in Extra-Intestinal Clinical Niches.Microorganisms · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comensal
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.