ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Genomic Landscape of Adenocarcinomas Across the Gastroesophageal Junction: Moving on From the Siewert Classification.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the origins of esophagogastric junction cancer through omics: A focus on the Siewert II subclassification.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Years of Life Lost of Patients With Early Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction Compared to Esophageal or Gastric Adenocarcinoma. A Registry-Based Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Biological Characteristics and Therapeutic Strategies for Resectable Locally Advanced Esophagogastric Junction Cancer: A Comprehensive Update.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Impact of prior cancer history on survival in patients with adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a retrospective cohort study using SEER database.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Genomics of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas and the Siewert classification.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- The biology and therapeutic implications of heterogeneity in Barrett oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Rethinking the Siewert classification in the era of precision oncology.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Identification of CD66c as a potential target in gastroesophageal junction cancer for antibody-drug conjugate development.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate how the Siewert classification of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas correlates with genomic profiles.
backgroundCurrent staging and treatment guidelines recommend that tumors with an epicenter <2 cm into the gastric cardia be treated as esophageal cancers, whereas tumors with an epicenter >2 cm into the cardia be staged and treated as gastric cancers. To date, however, few studies have compared the genomic profiles of the 3 Siewert classification groups to validate this distinction.
methodsUsing targeted tumor sequencing data on patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction previously treated with surgery at our institution, we compared genomic features across Siewert classification groups.
resultsA total of 350 patients were included: 121 had Siewert type I, 170 type II, and 59 type III. Comparisons by Siewert location revealed that Siewert types I and II were primarily characterized as the chromosomal instability molecular subtype and displayed Barrett metaplasia and p53 and cell cycle pathway dysregulation. Siewert type III tumors, by contrast, were more heterogeneous, including higher proportions of microsatellite instability and genomically stable tumors, and more frequently displayed ARID1A and somatic CDH1 alterations, signet ring cell features, and poor differentiation. Overall, Siewert type I and II tumors demonstrated greater genomic overlap with lower esophageal tumors, whereas Siewert type III tumors shared genomic features with gastric tumors.
conclusionsOverall, our results support recent updates in treatment and staging guidelines. Ultimately, however, molecular rather than anatomic classification may prove more valuable in determining staging, treatment, and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.