ArticleBritish journal of haematology2024
The impact of sickle cell disease and its treatment on ovarian reserve in reproductive-aged Black women.
Article in British journal of haematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ovarian Reserve in Women of Reproductive Age With Sickle Cell Anaemia: A Scoping Review.EJHaem · 2026Review
- Gynecologic and Reproductive Health in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: Underrecognized Challenges and Care Management Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We compared serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in women with sickle cell disease (SCD) (n = 152) to those of Black comparison women (n = 128) between the ages of 20 and 45 years and evaluated the impact of hydroxyurea (HU) and iron overload on ovarian reserve in those with SCD. SCD treatment was abstracted from medical records. Linear regression models were fit to examine the relationship between log(AMH) and SCD, adjusting for age. The analysis was repeated to account for HU use (current, previous, never) and iron overload (ferritin ≥1000 ng/mL vs. <1000 ng/mL). AMH estimates among women with SCD were lower than those among comparison women (2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-2.76 vs. 4.12, 95% CI 3.11-5.45, respectively). Women with SCD who were currently using HU had 63% lower (95% CI 43-76) AMH values than comparison women; those with SCD with prior or no HU use also had lower AMH estimates than comparison women, but the difference was less pronounced. There were no differences in predicted AMH values among women with SCD for those with and without iron overload. Women with SCD and low AMH may have a shorter reproductive window and may benefit from referral to a reproductive specialist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.