ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Predicting the recurrence of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for early neurological deterioration in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Low atherogenic index of plasma is associated with spontaneous hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke patients: a retrospective cohort study and predictive modeling based on machine learning.Lipids in health and disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in the ICU: A Multicenter Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Predicting long-term outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage: a comparative study of machine learning models highlights the prognostic value of hematoma clearance.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Prehospital intensive blood pressure management in intracerebral hemorrhage: current evidence, controversies, and future directions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting early neurological deterioration in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Predictive modeling of brain herniation risk factors and critical thresholds in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a pilot study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Predictors of poor outcomes in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Machine learning consensus clustering for inflammatory subtype analysis in stroke and its impact on mortality risk: a study based on NHANES (1999-2018).Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrence can worsen conditions and increase mortality in ICH patients. Predicting the recurrence risk and preventing or treating these patients is a rational strategy to improve outcomes potentially. A machine learning model with improved performance is necessary to predict recurrence. Methods: We collected data from ICH patients in two hospitals for our retrospective training cohort and prospective testing cohort. The outcome was the recurrence within one year. We constructed logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), decision trees, Voting Classifier, random forest, and XGBoost models for prediction. Results: The model included age, NIHSS score at discharge, hematoma volume at admission and discharge, PLT, AST, and CRP levels at admission, use of hypotensive drugs and history of stroke. In internal validation, logistic regression demonstrated an AUC of 0.89 and precision of 0.81, SVM showed an AUC of 0.93 and precision of 0.90, the random forest achieved an AUC of 0.95 and precision of 0.93, and XGBoost scored an AUC of 0.95 and precision of 0.92. In external validation, logistic regression achieved an AUC of 0.81 and precision of 0.79, SVM obtained an AUC of 0.87 and precision of 0.76, the random forest reached an AUC of 0.92 and precision of 0.86, and XGBoost recorded an AUC of 0.93 and precision of 0.91. Conclusion: The machine learning models performed better in predicting ICH recurrence than traditional statistical models. The XGBoost model demonstrated the best comprehensive performance for predicting ICH recurrence in the external testing cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.