ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024
Establishment and validation of a 3-month prediction model for poor functional outcomes in patients with acute cardiogenic cerebral embolism related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-Related Biomarkers in Diabetic Foot Ulcers Based on Bioinformatics.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Combined Predictive Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and CHA2DS2-VASc Score for Cardiogenic Cerebral Embolism in NVAF Patients.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Cardiogenic cerebral embolism (CCE) poses a significant health risk; however, there is a dearth of published prognostic prediction models addressing this issue. Our objective is to establish prognostic prediction models (PM) for predicting poor functional outcomes at 3 months in patients with acute CCE associated with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and perform both internal and external validations. Methods: We included a total of 730 CCE patients in the development cohort. The external regional validation cohort comprised 118 patients, while the external time-sequential validation cohort included 63 patients. Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) was utilized to address missing values and the least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression was implemented through the glmnet package, to screen variables. Results: The 3-month prediction model for poor functional outcomes, denoted as N-ABCD2, was established using the following variables: NIHSS score at admission (N), Age (A), Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer polymers (D), and discharge with antithrombotic medication (D). The model's Akaike information criterion (AIC) was 637.98, and the area under Curve (AUC) for the development cohort, external regional, and time-sequential cohorts were 0.878 (95% Conclusion: The N-ABCD2 model can accurately predict poor outcomes at 3 months for CCE patients with NVAF, demonstrating strong prediction abilities. Moreover, the model relies on objective variables that are readily obtainable in clinical practice, enhancing its convenience and applicability in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.