Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38841679›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

"We're one small piece of the puzzle": evaluating the impact of short-term funding for tier two weight management services.

Jordan D Beaumont, Elysa Ioannou, Krishna Harish, Nnedinma Elewendu, Nicola Corrigan, Lucie Nield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordan D BeaumontCollege of Business, Technology and Engineering, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Elysa IoannouSport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Krishna HarishCollege of Business, Technology and Engineering, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nnedinma ElewenduCollege of Social Sciences and Arts, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Nicola CorriganOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, Blenheim House, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Lucie NieldCollege of Business, Technology and Engineering, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Overweight and obesity are a global health epidemic and many attempts have been made to address the rising prevalence. In March 2021 the UK government announced £100 million of additional funding for weight management provisions. Of this, £30.5 million was split across local authorities in England to support the expansion of tier two behavioural weight management services for adults. The present work aimed to explore how this funding was used within the Yorkshire and Humber region to consolidate learning, collate best practice, and provide recommendations for future funding use. Method: One-hour semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 weight management service commissioners representing 9 of the 15 local authorities in the region. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using an established health inequality framework. From this, recommendations were co-developed with the commissioner group to establish best practice for future funding use. Results: Commissioners recognised that targeted weight management services were only one small piece of the puzzle for effectively managing obesity. Therefore, recommendations include targeting underserved communities, focussing on early prevention, addressing weight management in a whole systems context, and embracing innovative and holistic approaches to weight management. Discussion: Current short-term funding and restrictive commissioning processes of tier two services prevents sustainable and innovative weight management practice which is detrimental to patients, falls short of addressing health inequalities and negatively impacts staff health and wellbeing.

Indexed as

ObesityAdultEnglandFinancing, GovernmentHumansInterviews as TopicOverweightQualitative ResearchWeight Reduction Programsgovernment fundingobesitypublic healthservice evaluationweight management

Identifiers

PMID38841679
PMCPMC11150676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.